You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[+]3986561?4 points19 points23 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]3986561?4 points
19 points
23 points
(+23|-4)
ago
(edited ago)
"The NOAA is controlled by Jews who use Hollywood to perpetuate a myth that the tens of billions of tons of greenhouse gasses mankind produces every year are having an effect on the climate. Instead, the truth is that the independently verified, globally accepted change from ~250 parts-per-million of atmospheric CO2 concentration to ~350 PPM is caused because Jews want to turn white people into cucks for Arabs and leftists, and every researcher who has ever obtained an arctic ice core sample and put it into a gas chromatograph to obtain the historic CO2 concentration has just been paid off by dirty Jew money.
CO2 isn't being emitted by the agriculture, transportation, and manufacturing sectors, atmospheric CO2 concentrations haven't been rising, and even when I inconsistently admit they have been rising, it's due to a natural cycle and even though I dismiss the very concept of science, here's a fringe scientific article showing that this is natural, and even if it wasn't, greenhouse gases can't cause temperatures to rise. Jews."
Beautiful. I just linked that same NOAA page to a climate denier in another thread. Instant downvote, followed by a graph spanning 5 million years suggesting a downward trend.
My father-in-law told me that there is literally a global conspiracy to "adjust" weather station readings so that they conform to the global warming narrative.
Yep, that 130+ year record. In planetary terms that isn't even long enough to be considered a blink. Now, when it actually gets warmer than it has ever been, that's gonna be a hell of a problem, for whatever could survive those conditions.
[–]BustyChicksFTW8 points
-3 points
5 points
(+5|-8)
ago
(edited ago)
Actually, scientifically speaking and mathematically observing, we'll kill more than the Permian extinction (75% terrestrial species and 95% of aquatic species) at the rhythm that we're going at. There is even a calculated small chance that we end up a barren world like Mars due to vicious cycles and chain reactions.
Edit: Welp the downvotes sadden me since those are scientific theories with actual numbers and Voat is supposed to be open-minded and a free speech platform but hey. Whatever I guess.
One wonders why NOAA uses ground based data to measure temperature to claim 2015 was the warmest year ever when it has climate satellites that say 2015 was not the warmest.
Sort: Top
[–] GumbyTM 4 points 10 points 14 points (+14|-4) ago
That's funny when 2014 was one of the coldest years EVER you all just said weather != climate.
But when it's warm, that's proof positive, confirmation bias much?
[–] BustyChicksFTW 3 points 8 points 11 points (+11|-3) ago
That was a cold wave that was only valid for the north east of the states.
[–] Sippio 2 points 7 points 9 points (+9|-2) ago
Exactly. The key word is "global" which represents more than just wherever you live.
[–] 0x5f3759df 2 points 4 points 6 points (+6|-2) ago
I'm pretty sure both the warmest and coldest year ever happened well before humans existed.
[–] cli-che-guevara 7 points 5 points 12 points (+12|-7) ago
So much for the "18 years" bullshit. I wonder what the average Voater will come up with this time.
[–] 3986561? 4 points 19 points 23 points (+23|-4) ago (edited ago)
"The NOAA is controlled by Jews who use Hollywood to perpetuate a myth that the tens of billions of tons of greenhouse gasses mankind produces every year are having an effect on the climate. Instead, the truth is that the independently verified, globally accepted change from ~250 parts-per-million of atmospheric CO2 concentration to ~350 PPM is caused because Jews want to turn white people into cucks for Arabs and leftists, and every researcher who has ever obtained an arctic ice core sample and put it into a gas chromatograph to obtain the historic CO2 concentration has just been paid off by dirty Jew money.
CO2 isn't being emitted by the agriculture, transportation, and manufacturing sectors, atmospheric CO2 concentrations haven't been rising, and even when I inconsistently admit they have been rising, it's due to a natural cycle and even though I dismiss the very concept of science, here's a fringe scientific article showing that this is natural, and even if it wasn't, greenhouse gases can't cause temperatures to rise. Jews."
[–] Sippio 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
Beautiful. I just linked that same NOAA page to a climate denier in another thread. Instant downvote, followed by a graph spanning 5 million years suggesting a downward trend.
[–] tame 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
My father-in-law told me that there is literally a global conspiracy to "adjust" weather station readings so that they conform to the global warming narrative.
I wish I were making this up.
[–] BustyChicksFTW 5 points -2 points 3 points (+3|-5) ago (edited ago)
This comment literally gave me a headache. Jews this, jews that. Islam this, islam that. Christ Voat.
[–] indiglo_girls 3 points 4 points 7 points (+7|-3) ago
Yep, that 130+ year record. In planetary terms that isn't even long enough to be considered a blink. Now, when it actually gets warmer than it has ever been, that's gonna be a hell of a problem, for whatever could survive those conditions.
[–] mamwad 2 points 9 points 11 points (+11|-2) ago (edited ago)
Why don't we nip the problem in the bud before we kill 90% of the species on earth? Trust me, that won't be a fun time.
[–] BustyChicksFTW 8 points -3 points 5 points (+5|-8) ago (edited ago)
Actually, scientifically speaking and mathematically observing, we'll kill more than the Permian extinction (75% terrestrial species and 95% of aquatic species) at the rhythm that we're going at. There is even a calculated small chance that we end up a barren world like Mars due to vicious cycles and chain reactions.
Edit: Welp the downvotes sadden me since those are scientific theories with actual numbers and Voat is supposed to be open-minded and a free speech platform but hey. Whatever I guess.
[–] gosso920 3 points 2 points 5 points (+5|-3) ago
The warm-mongers are at it again.
[–] HoocOtt 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago
One wonders why NOAA uses ground based data to measure temperature to claim 2015 was the warmest year ever when it has climate satellites that say 2015 was not the warmest.
[–] massiveprivilege 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Good.