Posted by: Aelbric
Posting time: 5.7 years ago on 4/6/2015 9:11:06 PM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 624
SCP: 12
12 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~2 user(s) here now
Please try to post direct links to journals. Biased articles and sensational titles will be deleted.
Other Science Subs:
/v/labrat
/v/chemistry
/v/biochemistry
/v/microbiology
/v/neuroscience
/v/computationalbiology
/v/psychology
/v/archaeology
/v/herpetology
/v/OldScience
The rules can be found here. Please read the full post for specifics.
An abridged version is available below:
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived The Large Hadron Collider Is Back In Action (forbes.com)
submitted 5.7 years ago by Aelbric
view the rest of the comments →
[–] DoubleOhGadget 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 5.7 years ago
Well, it had to be created in the first moments after the big bang. Surely we should be able to create it as well.
[–] snacksmoto 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 5.7 years ago
Quite possible, if scientists knew what they were trying to create. Heck, they've made anti-matter. Albeit extremely tiny amounts, but they did it.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] DoubleOhGadget ago
Well, it had to be created in the first moments after the big bang. Surely we should be able to create it as well.
[–] snacksmoto ago
Quite possible, if scientists knew what they were trying to create. Heck, they've made anti-matter. Albeit extremely tiny amounts, but they did it.