Posted by: Sullysq
Posting time: 5 years ago on 12/19/2015 5:57:16 AM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 464
SCP: 0
5 upvotes, 5 downvotes (50% upvoted it)
~2 user(s) here now
Please try to post direct links to journals. Biased articles and sensational titles will be deleted.
Other Science Subs:
/v/labrat
/v/chemistry
/v/biochemistry
/v/microbiology
/v/neuroscience
/v/computationalbiology
/v/psychology
/v/archaeology
/v/herpetology
/v/OldScience
The rules can be found here. Please read the full post for specifics.
An abridged version is available below:
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived The Electric Comet Best Evidence (youtube.com)
submitted 5 years ago by Sullysq
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Sullysq [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) 5 years ago
It's comical to watch you cede the argument so easily and resort to calls for censorship when you were so ready to debunk it earlier.
Your head in the sand approach to contrary evidence shows your religious and dogmatic stripes. Neither of which have any place in science.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Sullysq [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
It's comical to watch you cede the argument so easily and resort to calls for censorship when you were so ready to debunk it earlier.
Your head in the sand approach to contrary evidence shows your religious and dogmatic stripes. Neither of which have any place in science.