Posted by: causuistry
Posting time: 5 years ago on 12/17/2015 6:16:51 PM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 600
SCP: 56
59 upvotes, 3 downvotes (95% upvoted it)
~2 user(s) here now
Please try to post direct links to journals. Biased articles and sensational titles will be deleted.
Other Science Subs:
/v/labrat
/v/chemistry
/v/biochemistry
/v/microbiology
/v/neuroscience
/v/computationalbiology
/v/psychology
/v/archaeology
/v/herpetology
/v/OldScience
The rules can be found here. Please read the full post for specifics.
An abridged version is available below:
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived There is no reliable way to detect ovarian cancer, which may explain why most women who are diagnosed already have advanced disease. But this test may change that (time.com)
submitted 5 years ago by causuistry
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Motoko 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 5 years ago
I bet that really put things in perspective for you.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Motoko 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I bet that really put things in perspective for you.