You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Slug 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Hi TSG.

It's a pretty well worded and I agree with most of these policies. The only problem I have with it is the flairing system. It looks pretty good at first glance, but I can see some people complaining about the rather subjective nature of the flairing system. If it's "really shady" who decides that? Is there an objective way that we can decide it?

For example, Huffington Post has pretty much become clickbait at this point, but can occasionally have some well written articles. Does it receive a 3, or a 5?

I think that the flairing system could work, but it needs some more work before it can be fully implemented. Maybe a trial run of a week or so?

Submitting links to only one domain repeatedly is not allowed: To be clear, links should be submitted at around a 9:1 ratio -- that is, 9 links from somewhere else for every post that is made from a source you wish to promote.†

"Self promotion is allowed as long as it doesn't exceed one tenth of your submissions to /v/science. It must also be relevant." maybe?

My timezone is EST (GMT-05:00)

0
0

[–] Teh_Sauce_Guy [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yeah, we're probably scrapping the flair idea at this point, someone suggested a better method. There's a main thread that's stickied with all the user's comments.

0
0

[–] Slug 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Reading it now, thanks. :D