Archived We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe (blogs.scientificamerican.com)
submitted ago by The_Ghost
Posted by: The_Ghost
Posting time: 7 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 8/23/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 271
SCP: 0
6 upvotes, 6 downvotes (50% upvoted it)
Archived We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe (blogs.scientificamerican.com)
submitted ago by The_Ghost
view the rest of the comments →
[–] derram 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
https://archive.ph/jOTp0 :
'Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. '
'Meanwhile, we are seeing increases in certain types of head and neck tumors in tumor registries, which may be at least partially attributable to the proliferation of cell phone radiation. '
'The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. '
'New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. '
'The Ramazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key finding of the NTP using a different carrier frequency and much weaker exposure to cell phone radiation over the life of the rats. '
This has been an automated message.