Posted by: babajee
Posting time: 1.3 years ago on 8/23/2019 3:05:17 AM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 11/21/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 27
SCP: 11
12 upvotes, 1 downvotes (92% upvoted it)
~2 user(s) here now
Please try to post direct links to journals. Biased articles and sensational titles will be deleted.
Other Science Subs:
/v/labrat
/v/chemistry
/v/biochemistry
/v/microbiology
/v/neuroscience
/v/computationalbiology
/v/psychology
/v/archaeology
/v/herpetology
/v/OldScience
The rules can be found here. Please read the full post for specifics.
An abridged version is available below:
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived Is LEAPER a Safer Substitute to CRISPR? (livescience.tech)
submitted 1.3 years ago by babajee
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Raymond43652 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) 1.3 years ago
More likely, its a 'chinese' version of CRISPR...
I don't trust anything made in China
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Raymond43652 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
More likely, its a 'chinese' version of CRISPR...
I don't trust anything made in China