You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
60

[–] Eualos 0 points 60 points (+60|-0) ago 

We're going into a solar minimum and they're going to cause an ice age or poison large parts of the plant

3
48

[–] Tallest_Skil 3 points 48 points (+51|-3) ago 

They’re going to do nothing but spread poison (because we can’t do a damn thing to the climate) and when the temperatures fall off naturally they’re going to claim that “we saved the world from global warming ha ha now it’s time for communism goyim.”

0
10

[–] Eualos 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Sounds about right

0
2

[–] MuslimPorn 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

There's a simple problem with deliberately blocking the sun with particles. Photosynthesis needs light on a virtually global scale.

If you consider what likely done the dinosaurs in then it likely wasn't just the cold from all. The dust would have almost certainly had a significant impact blocking much of the sunlight over much of the planet for months to years. Everything at the bottom of the food chain that uses photosynthesis takes a huge hit. From plants to algae.

Deliberately blocking the sun and lowering the temperature is actually really easy for us to do but not without screwing up the ecosystem.

It's a desperate measure that only makes sense if able to minimise the impact on photosynthesis and causes less disruption than climate change would.

Not to mention controlling it if it goes wrong. This is also the only way to easily bring about a Noah's Ark scenario. It's a WMD.

This is why nuclear winter is so devastating. It's not just cold and darkness for years but all farming collapses, no yield for a year, the whole ecosystem crashes and virtually everyone starves planet wide. In fact a weapon that can do that is more dangerous than nukes. Nukes will destroy cities but saturating the upper atmosphere in light blocking particles wipes out most life on top of the food chain.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

1
14

[–] theHare 1 point 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

These people are insane. They have been talking about doing this for years and it will be rolled out before a solar minimum which could be a big one regardless. They want to starve everyone it seems.

0
13

[–] FlyinToadstar 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

I'm looking forward to the lawsuits from agricultural areas of the country. How is Harvard going to prove that they're not responsible for any/all negative weather deviations that occur during the "experiment".

0
9

[–] Smells_Like_Tacos 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Less lawyers and more bullets.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] modsrcuntz 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This exactly. We are going into a solar minimum that's why there is something they aren't telling us. This makes no sense.

0
2

[–] Deplorablepoetry 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Harvard university is a festering shithole of ivory tower terrorism.

Communist indoctrination institution.

0
0

[–] ShakklezthaKlown ago 

solar minimum would have a .25% drop in solar radiation reaching Earth. that's so much solar radiation it could heat Pluto to the temperature of Mercury in .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000003 seconds.