You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
if you don't trust the scientific community at large
Nope, I just realize that scientists are humans, and therefore have bias for various human reasons. In the climate "science" community, there is a big problem when scientists are getting paid by government organizations looking to push a specific agenda - that is, catastrophic climate change. As a result, the science they produce is unreliable at best.
a lot of models have been updated as more accurate data
They keep getting updates, but despite all the updates they keep being wrong, 100% of the time. You can do all the updates you want, but if your models never accurately predict climate, they are junk and should be trashed. The fact that they haven't been just exposes the bias and dishonesty in the climate "science" community.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] escapetomars ago
Nope, I just realize that scientists are humans, and therefore have bias for various human reasons. In the climate "science" community, there is a big problem when scientists are getting paid by government organizations looking to push a specific agenda - that is, catastrophic climate change. As a result, the science they produce is unreliable at best.
They keep getting updates, but despite all the updates they keep being wrong, 100% of the time. You can do all the updates you want, but if your models never accurately predict climate, they are junk and should be trashed. The fact that they haven't been just exposes the bias and dishonesty in the climate "science" community.