You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
No, scientists who are referenced in global warming debate often have peer-reviewed studies on the topic at hand. This has been an issue for decades now and the science hasn't been proven false yet. Sure, there have been mistakes and badly calibrated readings but even with those corrections the model and outlook is not looking good.
[–]escapetomars0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
peer-reviewed studies on the topic at hand
Peer review is not very valuable in a field of study were your "peers" can't be trusted to be honest or objective.
This has been an issue for decades now and the science hasn't been proven false yet.
This statement completely contradicts the facts. In fact, when global warming models are looked at, the inverse is true - in decades, no single model has been proven true yet. Further, the scientific evidence is very clear, the predictions of the global warming alarmists has no basis in scientific fact.
On your first point, I guess if you don't trust the scientific community at large then you wouldn't trust peer-review anyway. Nothing I can do to sway you on that opinion.
For the second point, a lot of models have been updated as more accurate data comes along and the vast majority of those models have been updated towards more warming and more sea level rise. It is not going to be pretty in the next few hundred years unless we get our act together now.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Level_Cannon ago
No, scientists who are referenced in global warming debate often have peer-reviewed studies on the topic at hand. This has been an issue for decades now and the science hasn't been proven false yet. Sure, there have been mistakes and badly calibrated readings but even with those corrections the model and outlook is not looking good.
[–] escapetomars ago (edited ago)
Peer review is not very valuable in a field of study were your "peers" can't be trusted to be honest or objective.
This statement completely contradicts the facts. In fact, when global warming models are looked at, the inverse is true - in decades, no single model has been proven true yet. Further, the scientific evidence is very clear, the predictions of the global warming alarmists has no basis in scientific fact.
[–] Level_Cannon ago
On your first point, I guess if you don't trust the scientific community at large then you wouldn't trust peer-review anyway. Nothing I can do to sway you on that opinion.
For the second point, a lot of models have been updated as more accurate data comes along and the vast majority of those models have been updated towards more warming and more sea level rise. It is not going to be pretty in the next few hundred years unless we get our act together now.