You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
That generation of men was a thousand times harder than people today. They had little qualms if they lived or died there, as they already had made history. You'd be surprised what mental strength people can have if they aren't babied all their lives, have a stable family to grow up in, a unified society in the towns and cities and a society supporting them.
And they are the hardest of that generation, trained to be as fearless they can be.
You would be astonished what mental strength even the regular Joe would develop today if today's environment would be a unified functional ethnostate.
Also, psychological observation of behavior is not evidence. You couldn't tell if they were too fearless or if today's standard is too pussified.
i dont think the moon landing happened but i dont really think their behavior alone disproves it. coupled with the other sketchy stuff though it makes a good case
Nope, the definitely didn’t go to the moon - which explains their stressed and anxious countenances in first press conference free they were back. And also why those old timey astronots won’t swear on a bible that they went to the moon. Because they didn’t.
[+]phoenix8830 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]phoenix8830 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I did not rule out that possibility. However, this claim requires proof and I'm very sceptical about subjective perception of stress and relaxation in voices of people growing up in a far different world and recorded fifty years ago.
It may be enough reason to suspect fraud, but without proof it remains speculative.
Also, it is quite irrelevant for present day politics. Even if it were fraud, it would mean nothing for our time if that fraud was revealed. None of our lives would experience any kind of improvement, nobody would get richer or happier, and none of our living conditions would become any safer from white extinction. Maybe white extinction would be accelerated, because anti white shilling would gain a new foothold.
Sure, truth above all, but there's truth that doesn't matter much.
You know what truths matter a lot. 9-11 and the death camps. The truth about these events have tremendous consequences for our daily situation and finding discrepancies there would unseat almost the entire political landscape. JFK would be similar, if not as far reaching.
That's why I suspect everyone who introduces new and irrelevant truther debates to be a paid shill. Flat Earth, moon landing, vaccines - irrelevant or much less relevant than most other topics.
Imagine for a minute the moon landing was revealed as a hoax tomorrow. What would happen? The government would tell us "yeah we lied but it was a lie we used to defeat the Ruskies, because they overextended their resources far and wide to win the space race. It was a lie to make the Soviet Union bankrupt themselves, and they did. We won, cool story, bro." - that's the best possible scenario and that is worth nothing to us. When the best possible outcome is worth that little, it makes no sense to pursue it.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] phoenix883 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
That generation of men was a thousand times harder than people today. They had little qualms if they lived or died there, as they already had made history. You'd be surprised what mental strength people can have if they aren't babied all their lives, have a stable family to grow up in, a unified society in the towns and cities and a society supporting them.
And they are the hardest of that generation, trained to be as fearless they can be.
You would be astonished what mental strength even the regular Joe would develop today if today's environment would be a unified functional ethnostate.
Also, psychological observation of behavior is not evidence. You couldn't tell if they were too fearless or if today's standard is too pussified.
[–] Doglegwarrior 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I disagree but you were respectfull and made some valid points. I still dont believe it but people can disagree.
[–] YEAH_I_READ_BOOKS ago
i dont think the moon landing happened but i dont really think their behavior alone disproves it. coupled with the other sketchy stuff though it makes a good case
[–] NotTheMeanest 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Nope, the definitely didn’t go to the moon - which explains their stressed and anxious countenances in first press conference free they were back. And also why those old timey astronots won’t swear on a bible that they went to the moon. Because they didn’t.
[–] phoenix883 ago (edited ago)
I did not rule out that possibility. However, this claim requires proof and I'm very sceptical about subjective perception of stress and relaxation in voices of people growing up in a far different world and recorded fifty years ago.
It may be enough reason to suspect fraud, but without proof it remains speculative.
Also, it is quite irrelevant for present day politics. Even if it were fraud, it would mean nothing for our time if that fraud was revealed. None of our lives would experience any kind of improvement, nobody would get richer or happier, and none of our living conditions would become any safer from white extinction. Maybe white extinction would be accelerated, because anti white shilling would gain a new foothold.
Sure, truth above all, but there's truth that doesn't matter much.
You know what truths matter a lot. 9-11 and the death camps. The truth about these events have tremendous consequences for our daily situation and finding discrepancies there would unseat almost the entire political landscape. JFK would be similar, if not as far reaching.
That's why I suspect everyone who introduces new and irrelevant truther debates to be a paid shill. Flat Earth, moon landing, vaccines - irrelevant or much less relevant than most other topics.
Imagine for a minute the moon landing was revealed as a hoax tomorrow. What would happen? The government would tell us "yeah we lied but it was a lie we used to defeat the Ruskies, because they overextended their resources far and wide to win the space race. It was a lie to make the Soviet Union bankrupt themselves, and they did. We won, cool story, bro." - that's the best possible scenario and that is worth nothing to us. When the best possible outcome is worth that little, it makes no sense to pursue it.