[–] 5v1soundsfair 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Isn't the whole coolness factor of stem cells that you can take them from wherever they are, hit them with the right mix of chemicals and then they become whatever you want them too? Why would it matter if there are none in the heart?

[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Because it means there's no healing the heart.

[–] Rellik88 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

So we need to inject Korean penis tips into hearts?

[–] Shekelstein6M 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Artificial hearts exist, though.

[–] ChaoticNeutral 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

Good, immortality isn’t a good thing.

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Immortality is impossible. Aging is a terrible thing.

[–] NeoGoat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

On the other hand, immorality is easy.

[–] BiochemistryStudent 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Cause cancer isn't A thing...

[–] killer7 [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Meanwhile, 1000-year lifespans have their ups and downs.

[–] XSS1337 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

So if we coat them in stem cells... say from children , live or die, they could repair damaged cells ? At least temporally ?

[–] NeoGoat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

TIL: Heart attacks are bad.

[–] HorseIsDead 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

This is on mice. How many times are we going to have to tell people that mice results don't translate to human results. That's why you hear about cancer being cured every 5 minutes.