You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
5

[–] NoisyCricket 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

In fact there is an ever larger growing body of evidence that we may have taken some seriously wrong turns in physics, astronomy, and archeology, to name a few, as far back as 100-150 years ago. Chances are there will be an upheaval to varying degrees throughout sometime over the next twenty to fifty years.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] NoisyCricket 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Agreed. It's a major red flag when scientists start talking in absolutes. Because it is amazingly arrogant to assume we know everything when the only thing we do know is that we don't.

0
1

[–] Artooweaboo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Any sources you'd like to share on this?

0
1

[–] NoisyCricket 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Any sources you'd like to share on this?

That's part of the problem. It's amazingly deep and requires non-trivial time to explore. Those within their fields who speak out are generally destroyed. When they do get a paper published they have to be very careful in what they say. In some cases they are forced to walk back their position even though their position is 100% supported by the evidence.

This is a good channel. Even if you disagree with their theory they are doing what many scientists refuse to do - practice science and the scientific method.

https://www.youtube.com/user/ThunderboltsProject

For example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-0JzSjDAQE

That video begins to address both physics and astronomy.

For example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnwAUVNhU0s

That video touches upon weather and climate as it relates to physics, science, space, and electricity. Gerald Pollack is well respected and has been doing decades of research on something as simple as water. His research is rather interesting. Only recently has been more broadly connected to other areas of research. But those connections require looking back in time. Which forces an evaluation upon forks in science which most refuse to even consider. Simply because doing so endangers their current funding or area of expertise.

As for archeology, did you know that the geologic record (hard science) directly contradicts many timelines offered by archeologists? Did you know that careers have been destroyed in this field by simply publishing papers as supported by radiocarbon dating? Their only crime was offering science which did not tow the party line. Such timelines are completely supported by the geologic record, in addition to other fields of science. Did you know that it appears society was reset roughly 12,000 year ago? There is overwhelming evidence this is the case. Again, completely substantiated by the geologic record. See The Younger Dryas impact event.

Again, if you're not wiling to look around with an open mind you'll never see what's actually been going on.

How about Climatology? Did you know there is an established record of fraud within this field? You would never know it if you listened to mainstream. Yet it is well documented.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wo7U_yfCyeU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbalx6UyAXY

It's really not difficult to find academic fraud by those who control mainstream. But for the laymen you have to spend considerable time to research for yourself. And for the professional, it's career suicide to not tow the line. For example, hundreds of contrary climate papers have been rejected or slow walked over the last decade. In an environment of publish or perish, what do you think that means?

If this appears weak, understand I'm not going to spend hours and hours collecting information for you. Especially for an off chance you might actually review the material. You can, however, jump in for yourself and see where it takes you. You'll quickly find there is a large body of evidence which completely contradicts what is widely believed to be true in many areas of science. This is especially true in the soft sciences, such was archeology.