[–] goatboy 2 points 40 points (+42|-2) ago  (edited ago)

The National Science Foundation wrote to have mention of their funding removed.

This is most troubling. Tax payers paid for the research. The research was conducted. Now Tax payers have no more public accountability because commie feminists on the NSF thought they could just remove their names from research we paid for?!

WTF?!

NO!

TRUMP, INVESTIGATE THE NSF! Fire these fuckers. Cut them off. Destroy the ivory tower that thinks to destroy the academy for communist ideals!

[–] 13772125? 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

If trump threatened this national foundation, CNN would run with "war on science"

[–] 13773573? 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Nobody cares, CNN is a bunch of “front holes.”

[–] Ken_bingo2 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Yea. So nobody should ever stand up for anything, because some assholes will call them names? Fuck off and die, cuck.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] Drakgan 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Hey. I resemble that remark.

[–] Feldorai 1 points 25 points (+26|-1) ago  (edited ago)

"In un-related news, the cure for cancer & STD's has disappeared as the studies findings was done by white people so it was found offensive. Now, back to Bob with the weather."

[–] madeoneforthis 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

That's honestly the part that is even scarier to me than the suppression of free speech for the sake of an agenda. Any new understanding about people, the universe, and how the world works is something that could potentially have amazing and incredible impacts people's quality of life - even if such effects are utterly unforeseen at the time the research is being done. You never know what new information will in some way contribute toward something unarguably good for mankind, and a practice of silencing it is unarguably bad for mankind.

...And that's to say nothing of the slippery slope...

[–] OppressiveShitposter 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

it could be the case that social custom and pressure has punished women for falling anywhere outside the norm.

Had to stop reading the article there. That's not journalism, that's spin. Men clearly have this trait through genetics.

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago  (edited ago)

social custom and pressure has punished women

Nobody wants whores as daughters.

Whores either dont procreate at all or form broken families which produce children which dont procreate.

Nobody wants to invest time, effort and opportunity into raising a daughter and then see it turn into a whore and end a blood line which has been existing for hundreds of years.

It is NOT social pressure, it is mostly pressure by their own parents. Parents do not want their children to fail in life, so they apply pressure on them. Being a whore means to fail as a woman. Being a whore is the female equivalent of a lazy, whiny, balding, overweight, unemployed pedophile.

[–] jthun2 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Whites don't push their kids enough anymore.

[–] enginedriver13 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Whores either dont procreate at all or form broken families which produce children which dont procreate.

Alas, now when social "safety nets" exist mostly to insulate people from the results of their own bad choices, plenty of whores can breed plenty of children supported by the welfare state.

[–] Ken_bingo2 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Your are basically describing the evolutionary psychology behind the patriarchy. Another bit of research that has been suppressed by the lapdogs of the jews.

[–] Guy_Justsome 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I don't think that statement denies genetics at all, instead, it speculates why a genetic difference would come about: the quirky women aren't deemed suitable breeding partners, and therefore can't pass on their "variant trait that appeared in a female."

[–] armday2day 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yeah there certainly isn't anything of value past that line.

[–] Marku1 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

....and we allow these walking tampons to vote and make input into society? wtf, this is where communism and thought control comes from.

[–] herbert_west 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I'm sure some Chinese journal would be more than happy to publish his paper. They're also doing a hell lot of research on the genetics behind intelligence, so I guess western journals are going to be deprecated soon, at least on "controversial" topics. Btw. here is a link to the paper: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088&context=rgp_rsr

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

I'm sure some Chinese journal would be more than happy to publish his paper.

The complaining faggot probably believes into "peer review" himself, and would rather publish it on arxiv for free than in a "low impact" foreign journal. His attempt to publish there shows that he is a part of the same academic faggotry thats now excommunicating him for blasphemy. He would probably do the same to others if their worldview only sufficiently deviated from his.

[–] jthun2 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

You are nuts. The author is not left wing, he's a normal American.

Arxiv is a pre-print server, you moron. You put a paper there before publication in a journal or conference so that it can get a DOI and you can get credit for it. It's there in case other researchers are working on the same problem and you are held up in publication.

[–] fuckmyreddit 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Can we show these Fucktards how the Streisand Effect works in relation to censorship?

It's the best way to get around this SJW bullshit.

[–] TheEUdidNothingWrong 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's less a theory and more a fact that males have greater variability than females.

[–] Drowpic 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You can see it literally everywhere.

[–] jthun2 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

but his task was to provide a potential explanation that could account for it

the lefties don't want an explanation or model

[–] Norm85 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

This is the university page for the lobbyist Amie Wilkinson that is mentioned in the article.

She should spend more time focussed on math and less on the social justice fee fees as her list of publications is lacklustre considering the length of time she has spent in the field (and she tries to pump up the number by including non published works in her list).

[–] Drowpic 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This is the university page for the lobbyist Amie Wilkinson that is mentioned in the article.

The bitch now is famous worldwide, though probably not the way she would like.

I hope this will echo back to her at some point of her academic career.

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I hope this will echo back to her at some point of her academic career.

What a humble hope.

I, on the other hand, hope that after we win the coming hot civil war, we can END academia alltogether, and "echo back" at all of their academic "careers" by ending them too. The idea that people should get paid doing work nobody needs, which is what "publishing papers" is, must be ended. They all have to get real, useful jobs and work at their useless hobbies in their spare time.

load more comments ▼ (24 remaining)