You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
41

[–] the_sharpest_knife 0 points 41 points (+41|-0) ago 

You cannot sjw science. That's why the math and science sections of wikipedia are still so reliable.

0
53

[–] Turn_Coat 0 points 53 points (+53|-0) ago 

That's what you say now. They're trying.

2
21

[–] the_sharpest_knife 2 points 21 points (+23|-2) ago 

Yeah they have a jew task force on there going at it hard. They've already started their campaign to remove "racism" from science.

Here's a link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_racism

Too bad scientists in the field apply all of this "psuedo science" on a day to day basis and these idiots who edit wikipedia end up looking like retards.

Like anyone would believe that there is not difference between a white/african/asian skull unless they had some weird agenda they were pushing.

0
5

[–] revfelix 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Common core, for instance.

0
3

[–] NeoGoat 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

They've succeeded far more than most imagine. "How many genders are there?" ... That is only the tip of the iceberg of what has been done.

0
6

[–] Thetiedyeguy 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Yeah but you can fake results and fire scientists who wrongthink so so only (((acctable))) science gets done, dosen't change the truth but sure dose skew perception.

0
0

[–] lifes-not-fair 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Harper tried to do that in Canada and lost an election (not saying that was the only cause)

0
1

[–] Silencedmajor 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago