[–] Eualos 1 points 92 points (+93|-1) ago 

Reality is the biggest red pill of all

[–] RealitySucksSorry 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

You can say that again ;)

[–] OyVey_theGoyimKnow 8 points -3 points (+5|-8) ago 

Username checks out.

[–] Koalemos_Grottesco 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

This. Reality is the ultimate redpill and nature is the ultimate fascist

[–] mrnicegoy 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

boy that is the fucking truth

[–] i_scream_trucks 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Live and work in the middle of it and try and explain to friends and family why you hate the fucking world so much all the time...

[–] the_sharpest_knife 0 points 41 points (+41|-0) ago 

You cannot sjw science. That's why the math and science sections of wikipedia are still so reliable.

[–] Turn_Coat 0 points 52 points (+52|-0) ago 

That's what you say now. They're trying.

[–] the_sharpest_knife 2 points 21 points (+23|-2) ago 

Yeah they have a jew task force on there going at it hard. They've already started their campaign to remove "racism" from science.

Here's a link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_racism

Too bad scientists in the field apply all of this "psuedo science" on a day to day basis and these idiots who edit wikipedia end up looking like retards.

Like anyone would believe that there is not difference between a white/african/asian skull unless they had some weird agenda they were pushing.

[–] revfelix 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Common core, for instance.

[–] NeoGoat 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

They've succeeded far more than most imagine. "How many genders are there?" ... That is only the tip of the iceberg of what has been done.

[–] Thetiedyeguy 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Yeah but you can fake results and fire scientists who wrongthink so so only (((acctable))) science gets done, dosen't change the truth but sure dose skew perception.

[–] lifes-not-fair 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Harper tried to do that in Canada and lost an election (not saying that was the only cause)

[–] Silencedmajor 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[–] Shilly_Mc_Shillface 1 points 16 points (+17|-1) ago 

Funny how a lot of traditions that seem so Old-Fashioned or archaic were born out of simple effectiveness. It wasn't some evil plan to control women, it just eliminated a lot of what we are experiencing today- neither sex is currently happy.

So, abstinence = prude or it can be difference between being a mommy or not.

[–] fartyshorts 5 points 11 points (+16|-5) ago 

It's caused by HPV, which is usually contracted by being a slut.

[–] Ban_Circumcision 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

several strians in particular, not all HPV causes cancer, if you had sex more than a handful of times, you prob have/had a strain even if it doesnt show up.

[–] fartyshorts 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

Oh, I certainly do. I try to collect them all.

[–] Ina_Pickle 7 points 10 points (+17|-7) ago 

Not entirely true. A woman could be pure as the driven snow. Save herself for her husband. But it makes no difference if her husband was a man-whore in his youth or cheats during the marriage.

[–] Hydrocephalus [S] 3 points 22 points (+25|-3) ago 

Yes, but that's why they call it risk factors, it increases the odds dramatically if the woman is a slut.

[–] Sarcastatron_9000 3 points 9 points (+12|-3) ago 

It's almost worse when it happens because the man you saved yourself for was a slut. Then you're paying for someone else's sins and there is no justice in that.

[–] CuriosityOnFire 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

source? gyno propaganda

[–] mergen 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

hmm I can think of a scenario. A man-whore could catch HPV , show no symptoms and pass it to his wife. Her HPV turns into cervical cancer.

[–] albatrosv15 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Structurally female is more involved with their body when there is sex. Also take account how a male can wipe off microorganisms much easier than female.

[–] primaryappellation 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Women have a much higher chance of catching STDs from each sexual partner

[–] Ina_Pickle 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Has a higher chance? Think that through. How can a woman catch an STD unless the man Already Has It.

[–] BordelonLoop 3 points 7 points (+10|-3) ago 

how about a woman who is married to a manwhore? did you ever think of that one?

[–] BlackGrapeDrank 5 points 6 points (+11|-5) ago 

men don't get cervical cancer.

[–] Wonder_Boy 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Only if you assume his gender

[–] BeefBourgignon 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

Men get HPV on the end of their peckers and then smear it around inside their wives' vaginas. Boom, cervical cancer in 20 or so years.

[–] lifes-not-fair 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

No, but they can lose their peckers (or lives) because of HPV

[–] Ina_Pickle 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

No. But men do get throat cancer from HPV.

[–] NeoGoat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

... They are fucked.

[–] cyclops1771 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

So, what you are saying is, hang out at cervical cancer wards?

[–] Hydrocephalus [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

And AA meetings.

[–] cyclops1771 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

That's a really good idea!!!!

[–] kevdude 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Shit and here I was looking for winners outside of Planned Parenthood clinics. You get free coffee at AA, right?

[–] primaryappellation 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I've never seen a man insult/think less of a woman for being chaste. I've seen sluts do it

load more comments ▼ (42 remaining)