You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
16

[–] canbot 4 points 16 points (+20|-4) ago 

Liberals came from conservatives. You have to be pretty fucking stupid not to realize this. Society is never formed in a vacuum.

Can you even explain what you mean by this? To me this looks like incoharent nonsense mixed with name calling aka your basic Reddit argument.

What flaw do you see with this study, besides it not conforming to your world view? Please be specific.

1
-1

[–] Pukudo 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Which study? The link goes straight to Science Alert which is a horrible source for anything true and digestible. The other two sources it mentions are studies on neurotism and genetic links and Link genetic markers for mental disorders like ADHD and Alzemiser having a positive effect on General intelligence. Linking it no further to that and not all the Race stuff people around here are spouting.

8
-7

[–] carlip 8 points -7 points (+1|-8) ago 

in US history, for example, there was a political party formed the late 1790s called the democratic-republican party. it split in 1825 over differences in federalism and how the service the citizens. one group took the name democrats the other took the name republican nationalists. the republican wing changed its name to Whig party from 1830 to around the start of the civil war and then back to republican a bit after. there was a progressive party form in 1912 as an offshoot from the democrats, but it was short lived due to WW1And the depression after.

0
1

[–] Ina_Pickle 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Yes, factually all true. But you ignore the actual philosophies espoused by either party during those eras.

Neither of them, regardless of ideology (the democrats were pretty damn regressiveand racist - wait how has that changed?) would be even slightly okay with the Left's current extreme deviancy, lack of morality, and their goal to completely the destabilize society.

And for what? They don't even know. They spout delusional bullshit. Bunch of brainwashed morons don't realize that the perfect dream society their masters promise is the carrot. Next comes the stick.

8
-8

[–] WMFrizzle666 8 points -8 points (+0|-8) ago  (edited ago)

They're saying that liberals were former conservatives, that something caused them to change and have a more open mindset. You should really work on your reading comprehension, you arrogant faggot.

1
5

[–] canbot 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Not only does your interpretation make no sense and is completely inacurate, OP replied with a completely different explanation. Arrogance is thinking you understand a comment that you clearly do not.

0
2

[–] Schreiber 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You mean they hit their head and become mentally retarded?

Open minded MY ARSE. Advocating gender reassignment surgery in children is fucking disgusting evil thing.

If anything the whole liberal movement have been perverted by satanist cabal who plan for humanity's destruction.

[–] [deleted] 9 points -8 points (+1|-9) ago 

[Deleted]

2
4

[–] canbot 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

Those are your euphemisms, they are not definitions or even commonly used understandings of those terms. Once you start extrapolating arguments from some twisted definition of terms you are no longer in reality. In reality liberals do not come from conservatives. In reality that makes no sense.

The meaning of intelligent is clearly defined as how well you do on IQ tests. You may feel that this is inaccurate, but that feeling does not trump science. IQ tests are valid because they have been proven to predict succes, and they have been proven by showing that people perform the same across many different IQ tests. They are repeatable and can make valuable predictions. Waving your and and saying that IQ science is flawed because IQ can't be measured is wrong. It is a lie.

0
1

[–] hafen 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

On the study, there are mesaureable stats, with significant utility, and that are known to be heritable.

Also here in the U.S. "liberal" means something else different from other places. It's synonymous with leftism, when it's inherently neither. Young people do tend to lean left-wing, and old people tend to lean right-wing. Lots of other potential reasons for that.

They're not all because "old people" are to blame. Existance is. Young people get a 'messianic complex', which can be channeled in ways both good and bad.

You're touching on something with the father son thing, which speaks to people of all ages needing to get their shit together ASAP.

0
0

[–] CrudOMatic 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Scientists can afford to fuck around because they play with assumptions all day long, but since mathematicians are bound by numbers-- there is no possibility of fooling anyone who's accountable to check the math.

Asserts superiority of math over science, forgets that math is so jewey that you can make 1+1=0 in a shit ton of different ways. Also forgets that science doesn't get the luxury of having Jew tricks to get the results they want. It either works or it doesn't.

0
0

[–] CrudOMatic 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Liberals believe in socialism and conservatives believe in capitalism. Both fail to understand the real problem.

Proceeds to huck communism with a new name.