You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Don't see entanglement as information exchange. It's a correlation, not a causation. When two objects are entangled, measurements on them become perfectly correlated, but that doesn't mean that you can use them for information transfer.
If you could initiate entanglement wouldn't that be information transfer then? A pulsating entanglement could be timed and since the transform is instantly transmitted. I guess I'm just hopeful and while I understand some quantum mechanics in brief I don't know enough to separate the bullshit from the science.
You can't entangle particles remotely, only locally. Furthermore, if you have only one half of an entangled pair, there is no way for you to tell if it's entangled with anything or not.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] The_Cat 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Don't see entanglement as information exchange. It's a correlation, not a causation. When two objects are entangled, measurements on them become perfectly correlated, but that doesn't mean that you can use them for information transfer.
[–] theshopper ago
If you could initiate entanglement wouldn't that be information transfer then? A pulsating entanglement could be timed and since the transform is instantly transmitted. I guess I'm just hopeful and while I understand some quantum mechanics in brief I don't know enough to separate the bullshit from the science.
[–] The_Cat ago
You can't entangle particles remotely, only locally. Furthermore, if you have only one half of an entangled pair, there is no way for you to tell if it's entangled with anything or not.