You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[+]The_Cat1 point-1 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]The_Cat1 point
-1 points
0 points
(+0|-1)
ago
(edited ago)
You're an idiot. In Einstein's original papers he consistently refers to relativity as "the theory of lorentz". Stop being blinded by propaganda of a hate-filled religion and get your facts straight.
[–]kingminos1 point
-1 points
0 points
(+0|-1)
ago
No pad're you speak like a fool . Herr Einstein stood on the shoulders of 3000 years of western science ... and saw things only a few of his contemporaries saw. Yes, 5/6 other men and perhaps a woman saw aspects of electro-magnetic relativity: Poincaré and Lorentz come to mind. We group these formalisms around Einsteins name and no harm is done by doing this.
PSA: Quantum entanglement can not and can never be used for faster-than-light communication or transportation. All information transfer is still bound by the speed of light. Anything else you might read is wrong.
I don't even think the writer understands the experiment lol, I guess 2 small aluminum "drums" or maybe tiny speakers that oscillate were tuned to the same frequency, one being powered traditionally the other receiving the information through entanglement. That's my best guess.
[–]kingminos0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
The two drums makes me think it's quantum dipole behavior that's being entangled . You ought to get Bessel-functions out of that "acoustic" dipole : 1+ ... 1_ thump-thaump-thump-thaump... and then ??????
Sort: Top
[–] GoldShekelSteinBerg 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
(((Einstein))) was a fraud, he plagerized the work of Olinto de Pretto.
[–] The_Cat 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
You're an idiot. In Einstein's original papers he consistently refers to relativity as "the theory of lorentz". Stop being blinded by propaganda of a hate-filled religion and get your facts straight.
[–] GoldShekelSteinBerg ago (edited ago)
My facts are straight, yours are not.
[–] kingminos 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
No pad're you speak like a fool . Herr Einstein stood on the shoulders of 3000 years of western science ... and saw things only a few of his contemporaries saw. Yes, 5/6 other men and perhaps a woman saw aspects of electro-magnetic relativity: Poincaré and Lorentz come to mind. We group these formalisms around Einsteins name and no harm is done by doing this.
[–] GoldShekelSteinBerg ago
(((Einstein))), the fraud, the liar, and lest not forget ..The JEW, fuck off kike, we can see the JIDF shilling from here, fuck you.
[–] newoldwave 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
The ability to communicate instantly over interstellar distances would open up things only dreamt of.
[–] The_Cat 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
True, but faster-than-light communication is impossible.
[–] newoldwave 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I understand that quantum entangled particles mirror each other's state changes instantly no matter how far apart. That is what I'm getting at.
[–] HighEnergyLife 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
That's pretty cool. If they can get the state to last longer, it'll change everything. Imagine Instant communication from space probes!
[–] chuckletrousers 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Not so fast there! en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_communication
[–] UsedToBeCujoQuarrel 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Think of the possibilities for porn!
[–] The_Cat 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
PSA: Quantum entanglement can not and can never be used for faster-than-light communication or transportation. All information transfer is still bound by the speed of light. Anything else you might read is wrong.
[–] Fibbideh 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
So, Star Trek transporters when?
[–] mag60 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I remember reading a paper on QE working with C60 buckyballs. It’s pretty amazing shit.
[–] privacy_first ago
The article is quite short on details, a pity. Maybe someone can describe what the experiment is ?
[–] theshopper ago
I don't even think the writer understands the experiment lol, I guess 2 small aluminum "drums" or maybe tiny speakers that oscillate were tuned to the same frequency, one being powered traditionally the other receiving the information through entanglement. That's my best guess.
[–] kingminos ago
The two drums makes me think it's quantum dipole behavior that's being entangled . You ought to get Bessel-functions out of that "acoustic" dipole : 1+ ... 1_ thump-thaump-thump-thaump... and then ??????