[–] dellcos 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The "wall" is the fact that significant findings are buried and ignored for decades and decades. If they all stopped doing any research at all and FAMILIARIZED THEMSELVES WITH EXISTING FINDINGS, we'd have a new scientific revolution.

[–] haveyoursafespace1 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Hit a wall? No. Gone off the rails decades ago.

Popular vote is not science.

Bought and paid for opinion is not science.

Consensus is not science.

Niel the ass (nigger) is not science.

Bill Nye the religious guy is not science.

Never A Straight Answer (NASA) is not science, with their fake ass pictures and virtual reality 'models'.

Science is very nearly dead, in it's place political agenda and profit.

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Well put, and quite true.

[–] Scablifter 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yes, The peer review process is badly damaged by powerful vested interests manipulating the results to suit themselves and the standard model of physics is a very dead parrot indeed thanks to CERN and the research into Cold Fusion.

[–] Moodog 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Research is hitting a wall. And all it takes is a single breakthrough to knock it down.

[–] derram 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

https://archive.fo/2BAuG :

Is Science Hitting a Wall? - Scientific American Blog Network

'Here are a few (and see also my follow-up to this post, “Is Science Hitting a Wall?', "Readers also sent me these comments:Andrew Odlyzko, mathematician: I don't think science is hitting a wall."

'It must question the value of research and “innovation” and weigh the costs and benefits of different scientific enterprises. '

'They cited projects, such as the Center for Open Science and Stanford’s Meta-Research Innovation Center, aimed at making science more transparent, reliable and efficient. '

'Isn’t that, ultimately, what science is about?*When science regresses. '


This has been an automated message.

[–] ardvarcus 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

The wall that science is hitting is corruption, cheating, and a lack of ethical values, caused by the decline of Christianity and the influx of non-white, non-Christian men and women into the science field. Christian values kept Western science on the path of truth. Today we have such farces as the man-made global warming hypothesis, which is a complete fraud yet has consumed billions of dollars in resources. But that's only the largest and most obvious fraud -- today's science is literally riddled with plagiarism, faked data and complete fabrication of results, from the universities' undergrad theses right on up to the most prestigeous science journals. Science today is driven by politics, greed, and emotionalism. The increase in the number of women involved in science has certainly played a significant role in this shift, but so has the decline in moral values and the influx of non-white, non-Christians ... which, of course, no one in the media or in the universities has the balls to even discuss openly.

[–] haveyoursafespace1 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

LMAO, what the fuck has christianity got to do with morality? Have you ever even seen a bible, much less opened it?

Nevermind it has fuck all to do with science. Religion is the opposite of science.

[–] SkeetSack 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

This is some dumb shit. If I ever wanted to know anything scientifically I wouldn't ask economists. "What is the most politicized "science"?", ECONOMICS. Period.