5
49

[–] aria_taint 5 points 49 points (+54|-5) ago 

This vaccine will be bought by a mega pharma for hundreds of millions and then quietly put in a vault and forgotten about. It happens every time something like this come to light. They make way more money off keeping you alive for 6-12 months than curing you. I totally believe a cure fore cancer has always been there but curing cancer like having cars run on water would destroy a lot of industries that cater to the problem.

0
20

[–] Plavonica 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

This vaccine will be bought by a mega pharma for hundreds of millions and then quietly put in a vault and forgotten about.

I don't doubt that this happens, but I think it's more about the absolute crap quality in science reporting than anything. They call every minor medical bit of progress as a cure for cancer, then when it inevitably leads to causing imminent death or even more cancer, they don't report it. And several years later you are left wondering wtf happened.

0
3

[–] tinyhousesbrah 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

But Plavonica, we have made such amazing progress in curing diseases of mice.

2
6

[–] fortuitouslyunfallen 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

like having cars run on water

Not really the same ballpark. Hiding potentially legitimate life changing vaccines to push a greedy agenda isn't the same as the energy barriers blocking the way to such things as running cars on water. It's completely infeasible to run cars on water to do the energy required to remove hydrogen from water.

That and the fact that what @Plavonica said, there is a cure for cancer every other week.

0
1

[–] MrShill 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I saw a YouTube video that claimed to do it through a catalyst rather than hydrology

0
1

[–] k_digi 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

What about using a relatively high voltage frequency pulsed 'flyback' configuration to pump 'energy' into a 'capacitor' at resonance - the source being water? wouldn't that help separate the bond between the H2o? i mean that's what Stan did. I think the key was that the isolated 'flyback' circuit was 'grounded' - this i think is not so dissimilar to if you pull apart your microwave oven or look up a schematic for the HV section that flows to the Magnetron. but in the end Stan died so we can't ask him.

0
6

[–] Mopsink 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I would agree with your first statement, either they will buy this cure and store it away or the people who worked on this cure and know the formula will start dying or committing suicide.

0
0

[–] littul_kitton 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They make way more money off keeping you alive for 6-12 months than curing you.

That's silly.

There are 15 million people living with cancer in the U.S. If you asked for $1,000 to cure each of them, you would earn $15 billion.

You are asking us to believe that a scientist making $75,000 a year will turn down a chance to make a share of $15 billion.

"All you have to do is run away from 15,000 million dollars, and I might not fire you next quarter. Step forward if you volunteer."

0
16

[–] Retron 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Unless there's more money selling a vaccine than in selling years of treatment for cancer (which I doubt) then big pharma probably doesn't give a shit. The reason cannabis isn't legal is because they can't patent the damn thing.

0
26

[–] Alopix 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

It's not actually a vaccine, they just used that word because they're retards

0
6

[–] Pumbadog 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Maybe all the cancer funds around the globe will come together and buy it and gift it to the people for free.

Oh wait... then they lose their jobs...

0
1

[–] hakrsakr 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This.

10this

0
14

[–] SolarBaby 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Right after Trump says he's making it a goal to remove any impediments that keep terminally ill patients from trying any experimental treatments they want.

0
9

[–] prairie 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Why should anyone be prevented from trying whatever substance they want, for whatever reason? (Tide Pods excepted)

0
13

[–] SolarBaby 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

The only thing I think should be prohibited is prohibition. Even tide pods because natural selection is healthy for a species.

0
13

[–] ot_to_know 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

This seems like a huge leap in cancer treatment. I hope this continues to prove positive results.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
15

[–] prairie 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Mice everywhere are cheering.

0
8

[–] WhoFramedReaderRabit 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Sorry Goyim, this treatment will never be available to you.

0
2

[–] TheTrigger 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

All the shadow-government type folks will be bathing in the stuff, though. You know, in exchange for political favors.

0
8

[–] ArsCortica 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Sounds almost too good to be true. I hate to be the negative nancy, but I fear that the cancer cells will find a way to overcome this treatment, too.

1
7

[–] BlueDrache 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

My dog died of breast cancer ... it didn't get aggressive until we had the first surgery to remove most of the mass. I was super reluctant to have it, as I knew it'd just piss the cancer off and it'd spread ... which it did ... but it gave her another six months of quality before it just ate her from the inside.

Being licensed in euthanasia, I was in the room and assisted in her humane death.

The point being ... cancer seems to be sentient at times, but I may be anthropomorphimising.

5
-3

[–] Cheesebooger 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago 

Isn't cancer just a fungus? There's ways of dealing with fungi

0
10

[–] ArsCortica 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Not sure if you're joking, but cancer boils down to a genetic mutation which causes regular body cells to multiply uncontrollably.

0
6

[–] TheBuddha 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

No. Cancer is caused by many things, but it is the result of DNA damaged in such a way that causes it to replicate the damaged DNA. A good example is the electromagnetic radiation being emitted by the sun. A particle of radiation will hit the DNA in just the right place to knock an electron off, causing that cell to replicate with the new error and spread to nearby cells. This becomes a certainty, given enough time. If you live to be 200 years old, your odds of cancer approach 100%.

It's just a function of cell replication and our DNA is prone to damage by a variety of means.

Now, it behaves similarly to a fungus. I suspect someone misread something or didn't fully understand it. Anti fungal medications don't have any benefit for cancer patients, as they are entirely different things. But, the behaviors exhibited have parallels to a fungus, which may be where the confusion comes from.

0
4

[–] greenfascist 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

no you fail basic biology.

cancer is your own body cells going rogue.

fungi are entirely separate organisms. eukaryotes (have a nucleus)

fungi are more related to you than bacteria and plants though.

0
4

[–] Alopix 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Available at an American doctor near you for the low price of going into debt for the rest of your life. But at least we don't have that evil single-payer nonsense.

0
2

[–] LetItBurn 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Please let's give the military industrial complex control over the medical system. We have a single payer system its called the VA, which is outstanding at curing the mental disorder of socialism.

0
1

[–] bman0321 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The DMV for medicine. It's good if you can get a an appointment. Obama really fucked us by making the VA worse.

0
3

[–] QuestionEverything 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

ACTUALLY. this is the real deal guys.

And you conspiracy theory guys are CORRECT as usual. -You see, customized immuno therapy is getting rolled out. And now there's competition. Expect to see the higher costing pt customized treatments first. their FDA rounds are done and they are good to go. -This is just a refinement of the same underlying treatment, but uses precursors to skip the customization steps/need.

Yes, they were 'lidding' this stuff, but Malthusian theory is finally being regarded as the BS it is. They are STILL using cancer as a profit machine however, or we'd have RIFE machines. (They're afraid they'd crash the whole medical industry.. and yeah, they would- but it would re-org towards REAL needs).

They use rife machines selectively. Ala Stephen Hawkings..

0
0

[–] commonsenseisded 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Wouldn't even curing cancer be a cash cow? As long as people procreate, there will be people developing cancer. I think if they developed an actual vaccine that prevented everyone from developing cancer to begin with. That would be kept away.

0
0

[–] QuestionEverything 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

There's alot of people they want to die from cancer is my best guess.. Give some groups advantages.. ugly shit.

load more comments ▼ (19 remaining)