You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] chirogonemd 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

The ability to breed and produce a viable offspring from a single breeding event is not sufficient to define two separate animals as being the same species. A lion and a tiger can mate and produce a "viable" offspring. A horse and a donkey can. You find that the rules tend to bend depending on the class. You may find biologists responsible for discovering two different frogs separated by 20 miles on a river will name these different species despite their ability to interbreed and being almost largely the same, except for occupying a different micro-habitat and possibly displaying some different behaviors.

The real issue is mongrelization. The offspring of two different 'species' may be viable, but over time genetic defects occur and accumulate, eventually leading to non-viability after a few generations. Intelligence will decrease. Fertility may be gone very quickly, and a first generation hybrid may be sterile.

But all humans are the same! Um, okay. Race mixing leads to mongrelization. This was a very specifically outlined goal of the Kalergi Plan. They realize that race mixing in humans leads to mongrel offspring, with the more events occuring over successive generations leading to greater and greater dilution of the favorable intelligence of the white european genetics.