You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Clearly if NASA has put men on the moon in the past for that amount of money they also can now. It is irrational to believe that it would cost more to do the same thing today than it cost to do it for the first time 50 years ago.
And, frankly, I don't care if other countries are wasting their resources by failing their constituents. The "2 wrongs make a right" argument does not impress me.
Clearly you're right. A man can set foot on the moon today. It just isn't any priority at all to the countries that could do it now. Sure it would be benefitial to go - but the people that decide what projects get funded aren't interested. I'm not sure how a manned Orion launch today would compare to an Apollo moon mission financially, I'm sure it's similar even considering inflation.
Anyways, how much of that are failures of space agencies or the governments that fund them I couldn't tell ya.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Dfens ago
Clearly if NASA has put men on the moon in the past for that amount of money they also can now. It is irrational to believe that it would cost more to do the same thing today than it cost to do it for the first time 50 years ago.
And, frankly, I don't care if other countries are wasting their resources by failing their constituents. The "2 wrongs make a right" argument does not impress me.
[–] Apeabel ago
Clearly you're right. A man can set foot on the moon today. It just isn't any priority at all to the countries that could do it now. Sure it would be benefitial to go - but the people that decide what projects get funded aren't interested. I'm not sure how a manned Orion launch today would compare to an Apollo moon mission financially, I'm sure it's similar even considering inflation.
Anyways, how much of that are failures of space agencies or the governments that fund them I couldn't tell ya.