0
15

[–] lemon11 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

In November of last year.

0
2

[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

From the paper:

The test campaign consisted of a forward thrust element that included performing testing at ambient pressure to establish and confirm good tuning, as well as subsequent power scans at 40, 60, and 80 W, with three thrust runs performed at each power setting for a total of nine runs at vacuum.

They used less power than some common lightbulbs. Why didn't they put at least a kilowatt into it - something a decent computer power supply can provide with ease? As much as I want to believe, it reeks to high heaven of cherry picking.

0
1

[–] Xeros 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

That's a really smart point. The experimental apparatus doesn't seem to crazy to build so hopefully its debunked or confirmed soon.

0
0

[–] littul_kitton 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Because the device is a resonator. Once a microwave photon is injected into it, it bounces around numerous times before being absorbed by the walls of the apparatus. I would not be surprised to learn that the average number of bounces (Q factor) is 100, which would give them a resonator power of 10,000 watts. If Q were 1000 and they put in 1000 watts, the resonator power would be a million watts. At some point the high voltages will start causing electric arcs inside the apparatus.

0
0

[–] The_Cat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That's really not how any of that works.

1
0

[–] prairie 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

You gotta operate in the noise to hallucinate it working. Your suggestion would make it fail spectacularly.

0
1

[–] ElectroGypsy 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

We should just make one and go to Mars. Do something awesome and dangerous before we truly understand everything about it. That would be by far the most human thing we've done since going to the moon.

0
0

[–] 8910114? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

why not just send one out away from us, see how fast we can get it going? its not like its that expensive to test.

0
0

[–] ElectroGypsy 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That's fine. Aim it at alpha centauri. Don't even slow down just keep accelerating the whole way set up to take whatever readings it can on its way past.

0
1

[–] Buttsloth 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This blew my mind... I need to get smarter...

0
0

[–] elitch2 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] HashTagFU 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I bailed on this when he made a big deal about charges being arbitrary and saying you could change + and - and it wouldn't make a difference. Somehow that was supposed to be

a) really hard to understand and

b) profound

What a bore.

0
1

[–] jesus_is_lord 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

they do everything on paper, now build a scientific model and show us how it accelerates in a vacuum

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] carlinco 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

And then they started with a satellite to test this in space...

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] 0x7a69 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I got as far as "currently accepted Copenhagen interpretation" and stopped.

0
0

[–] VelvetLurker69 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Open sourced reverse engineering of alien technology.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)