Archived Meta analysis of 19,430 publications finds no negative impacts of having same sex parents (sciencedirect.com)
submitted ago by CuteIceCube
Posted by: CuteIceCube
Posting time: 5.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 1828
SCP: 34
39 upvotes, 5 downvotes (89% upvoted it)
Archived Meta analysis of 19,430 publications finds no negative impacts of having same sex parents (sciencedirect.com)
submitted ago by CuteIceCube
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Number1dududuNumber1 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
So they looked at two things. Did they say compare the likelihood of a man raised by two women being able to knock together a table out of wood vs the ability of a man who had a father figure to do the same? How about the % of those males who are more or less inclined to pursue masculine lines of work. What about the number of thsoe men raised solely by women to perpetuate the SJW thought train.
In 25 years the world will be a shithole. It will be so politically correct that talking in public is going to be dangerous as any bitch and her bloody vagina will be able to scream RAPE or MISOGYNY and the poor sod who dared talk will get slammed.
SJW's, same sex parents and political correctness will destroy this world before any large scale warfare.
[–] Fact_Checking_Alien 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
You are still "begging the question". The question you need to ask is actually twofold, and philosophical. You perceive those acts to be masculine, and assume based on what you believe to be inherent masculinity that not doing those things makes one effeminate. At least that's your table hypothetical.
You go further, however, and seem to correlate lesbians with SJW perspectives. SJW narratives have proved, time and again, to have real negative socioeconomic effects. If no economic outcome loss was found, on average, then it's either not happening or part of a small group of outliers. If it were happening we'd see the consequences of those attitudes in the demographic outcomes of the resulting adults.
While you are connecting these things as consequences of same sex parents, data from studies should show indicators if those effects have outcome consequences.
Honestly the leaps you're using in your logic are so expansive it's making it very difficult to parse together. You have defined masculinity by traditionalist behaviors, without proving those traditional behaviors develop masculinity. You've not defined masculinity except in this circular fashion (therefore, begging the question). You blame same sex couples for what you then conclude is this lapse in masculinity, even though it should have outcome results that are negative if it were in fact the case.
Just...what?
[–] Number1dududuNumber1 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Let's try this again, since it's been 16 hours. You'll have to revisit the thread to read my 3-piece response thanks to character limits.
You either didn't read, ignored, or I am thinking about a different reply where I said that the impact of these things will not be seen for another 25 years, maybe 30. By then it will way too fucking late to rectify things. In the words of Marilyn Monroe "...if we don't conform to societies expectations then who will?"
I said that men raised solely by women are likely to perpetuate the SJW thought train, not that lesbians perpetuate the SJW though train. A man with no male impact on his life is more likely to succumb to the trivial shit that SJW's come up with. This effect can be seen today in what people call 'white knights'. They serve no real purpose except to gather female friends by pandering to their narcissistic tendencies. They back up their 'damsel in distress' hoping that she'll reward him for his efforts with friendship but all she does is use him as an emotional dump. How do I know this? Because that used to be me, a long time ago now. I fucked a word up in that paragraph which makes it read differently to intended.
That last sentence was fucked, it wasn't meant to read that lesbians perpetuate the SJW thought train but that men raised by two women are more likely to subscribe to their (SJW's) views because of their soft spot for women that will no doubt be present.
The following paragraph "In 25 years the world will be a shithole. It will be so politically correct that talking in public is going to be dangerous as any bitch and her bloody vagina will be able to scream RAPE or MISOGYNY and the poor sod who dared talk will get slammed." relates to the above statement that men are more and more likely to jump on board with SJW's principles that it will be impossible to live a normal life without fear of a lawsuit. What about the guys who for arrested for "manspreading" what is that shit? You know what, if a guy is manspreading it's because we have some extra fucking bits between our legs that don't just retract when we close out legs. You know what else? You could just politely ask him to close his legs so you can have a seat. Most men would gladly do so, being glad to have had any relief at all. This was also a bit sexist, I apologise for that as I do get carried away.
[–] Shammyhealz 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Had different sex parents. Couldn't build a halfway decent table if I tried. Besides the fact, as long as we're going on stereotypes, aren't lesbians supposed to be good at woodworking?
It's been shown multiple times that our peers are highly influential in our upbringing. Of all of the gay couples (male and female), I can't think of one that wouldn't send their kid to a woodworking class if they wanted to.
I fail to see how that's problematic. It does mean higher pay due to lower supply for those who are inclined to do "masculine" work, so that's a plus for your kids.
[–] Number1dududuNumber1 ago (edited ago)
Then you would be the exception and not the rule. Actually this could be an example of how gender based roles are already being negatively impacted by the negative stigma that society is attaching to being a manly man.
Though while you cannot build a table, which is just one example of a typically manly thing, what can you do? I bet you fall into a different of gender based stereotypical rules.
As for the less people = higher pay proposition, that's not the problem. The problem is supply and demand and the industry not being able to meet the minimum requirements of the population. No matter how much money you throw at people they can only do so much in a day.
Machines will have very little impact on the construction industry. Everything will still require human input. Even 3d printed building still require human monitoring since they can't do shit like put in windows in even our most advanced prototypes. Actually, the jobs most at risk by machinery are tosser commonly filed by women such at tellers, phone operators, receptionists, secretaries etc. Many of today jobs can and will be automated sin. Hell tellers are already being replaced by machines that do the same job without the human error factor.
So when the likelihood of men to do manly tasks decreases and the volume of "aoft" jobs available decreases it'll either push men who are disinclined to perform the job well back into an industry which will then be negatively impacted by bad tradesmanship or it will mean a skyrocketing unemployment rate.
this isn't going to happen tomorrow or next year. Hell, it might take 100 years to happen, but ut is my opinion, my belief, that if we continue down the current path of manshaming, white knighthood and same sex couple raising children then it is going to fuck our world.
I'm sure I just offended many people, that's great. Funny thing is I don't give a fuck what you think of my opinions and honestly you shouldn't give a fuck what my opinions are. Hell, this is the internet who really cares what anyone thinks when you can recede to a hugbox on another site. I'll probably appear in a tumblr post or a facebook conversation and someone'll get a big ol' pat on the back for calling me an asshole.
[–] creep 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Don't worry. The number of kids raised by two manly men will balance them out.
I'd never raise a kid to be an SJW or a sissy -- not that I want kids. Ugh.
[–] Number1dududuNumber1 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I appreciate the humorous approach to my viewpoint, though I think in time the balance will not be so... balanced.