Archived Meta analysis of 19,430 publications finds no negative impacts of having same sex parents (sciencedirect.com)
submitted ago by CuteIceCube
Posted by: CuteIceCube
Posting time: 5.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 1828
SCP: 34
39 upvotes, 5 downvotes (89% upvoted it)
Archived Meta analysis of 19,430 publications finds no negative impacts of having same sex parents (sciencedirect.com)
submitted ago by CuteIceCube
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Fact_Checking_Alien 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
Evidently as it is likely various studies in this meta-analysis checked for economic outcomes or psychological health, such cases are few and far between as two gay men turning their child into an effeminate queen. Your premise is entirely unsupported by the conclusion, because the premise itself needs to be proved. You are "begging the question" as it were.
Which is particularly odd to me for this study, making the claim there are no negative impacts, answers the question you are begging. What sort of negative impact do you expect "being a sissy bitch" to have? It must have no economic or psychological disadvantages, for those are two primary factors in studies of gender and parenting.
Or do you simply assume that, somehow, the most important factors in "impacts" of child rearing were excluded? Or that the mystery effects of "being a sissy bitch" have no economic or psychological impact noted, and therefore must have other unrecorded impacts?
[–] Number1dududuNumber1 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
So they looked at two things. Did they say compare the likelihood of a man raised by two women being able to knock together a table out of wood vs the ability of a man who had a father figure to do the same? How about the % of those males who are more or less inclined to pursue masculine lines of work. What about the number of thsoe men raised solely by women to perpetuate the SJW thought train.
In 25 years the world will be a shithole. It will be so politically correct that talking in public is going to be dangerous as any bitch and her bloody vagina will be able to scream RAPE or MISOGYNY and the poor sod who dared talk will get slammed.
SJW's, same sex parents and political correctness will destroy this world before any large scale warfare.
[–] Fact_Checking_Alien 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
You are still "begging the question". The question you need to ask is actually twofold, and philosophical. You perceive those acts to be masculine, and assume based on what you believe to be inherent masculinity that not doing those things makes one effeminate. At least that's your table hypothetical.
You go further, however, and seem to correlate lesbians with SJW perspectives. SJW narratives have proved, time and again, to have real negative socioeconomic effects. If no economic outcome loss was found, on average, then it's either not happening or part of a small group of outliers. If it were happening we'd see the consequences of those attitudes in the demographic outcomes of the resulting adults.
While you are connecting these things as consequences of same sex parents, data from studies should show indicators if those effects have outcome consequences.
Honestly the leaps you're using in your logic are so expansive it's making it very difficult to parse together. You have defined masculinity by traditionalist behaviors, without proving those traditional behaviors develop masculinity. You've not defined masculinity except in this circular fashion (therefore, begging the question). You blame same sex couples for what you then conclude is this lapse in masculinity, even though it should have outcome results that are negative if it were in fact the case.
Just...what?
[–] Shammyhealz 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Had different sex parents. Couldn't build a halfway decent table if I tried. Besides the fact, as long as we're going on stereotypes, aren't lesbians supposed to be good at woodworking?
It's been shown multiple times that our peers are highly influential in our upbringing. Of all of the gay couples (male and female), I can't think of one that wouldn't send their kid to a woodworking class if they wanted to.
I fail to see how that's problematic. It does mean higher pay due to lower supply for those who are inclined to do "masculine" work, so that's a plus for your kids.
[–] creep 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Don't worry. The number of kids raised by two manly men will balance them out.
I'd never raise a kid to be an SJW or a sissy -- not that I want kids. Ugh.
[–] Number1dududuNumber1 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
It's not letting me reply to your comments specifically. What is this shit?
actually, it's just not letting me post my reply. Maybe it's too long, but I tried cutting it into 3 pieces and still no go. Not sure what's going on.