You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] B3bomber 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Better thing to read: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v539/n7629/full/nature20153.html notably, the references section. All 137 things of what the fuck am I reading and why is this shit here? I wanted to see who was funding this crap. There's little chance any actual research was done. Read: no actual scientific testing. Especially with the dates involved in the "study" for the various references.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]