Archived Vaccines in the '60s made people more likely to develop chlamydia and now we know why (theverge.com)
submitted ago by Super-Script
Posted by: Super-Script
Posting time: 5.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 591
SCP: 36
36 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Archived Vaccines in the '60s made people more likely to develop chlamydia and now we know why (theverge.com)
submitted ago by Super-Script
Sort: Top
[–] James557 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
See now that's an anti vaccination movement I could've got behind...
As a side note, "humanized mice" sounds slightly terrifying
[–] ZappyKins 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Right, while we do know much about science and immunology, there is still so much left to learn. And if someone says we have it all figured out, then that's a statement of faith, not science.
Scientist will always question and challenge - or we would still think the Earth was the center of the universe.
[–] Super-Script [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
But.. but.. science always gets it right the first time. Right guys? Seriously though, how many dead mice do these people kill each year as a result of their research.
[–] zoechan 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
I'm pretty sure they don't kill the dead mice. = )
[–] Super-Script [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
http://img01.naturum.ne.jp/usr/nami/%E3%83%89%E3%83%83%E3%82%B0sama.jpg
[–] PontarTourist 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Yeah, fuck the Rabies Vaccine.... oh wait.
[–] Snorlax 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
ew verge
[–] cis-white-male ago
I've never heard of Verge before, but I thought the article was well written. It summed up the research without cutting corners, while still being relatively brief.