Posted by: Behuvius
Posting time: 4.3 years ago on 8/27/2016 3:10:29 PM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 217
SCP: 4
8 upvotes, 4 downvotes (67% upvoted it)
~2 user(s) here now
Please try to post direct links to journals. Biased articles and sensational titles will be deleted.
Other Science Subs:
/v/labrat
/v/chemistry
/v/biochemistry
/v/microbiology
/v/neuroscience
/v/computationalbiology
/v/psychology
/v/archaeology
/v/herpetology
/v/OldScience
The rules can be found here. Please read the full post for specifics.
An abridged version is available below:
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived JPL says we need to stop the growth of CO2 emissions by 2020 and be in net negative emissions by 2080. Can we do it? (science)
submitted 4.3 years ago by Behuvius
Link to the JPL video and references @21:46
https://youtu.be/VOg_l9eI08E
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Behuvius [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 4.3 years ago
There is a limit to how much CO2 helps plants, and that limit does not take long to reach. The law of diminishing returns applies here.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Behuvius [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
There is a limit to how much CO2 helps plants, and that limit does not take long to reach. The law of diminishing returns applies here.