1
13

[–] satnavtomington 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

Shamelessly going to plug /v/agnostic here, as yet it is still small but all is civilised and I plan to keep it that way. Feel free to start contributing there.

0
11

[–] endlessly_wandering [S] 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

I'm not going to sub because it's not what I have an interest in reading, but I commend you on keeping the discussions/content intelligent.

0
6

[–] satnavtomington 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

No worries, I hope you find something more to your liking :)

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

7
-2

[–] watitdew 7 points -2 points (+5|-7) ago 

Shamelessly going to hijack the top post to plug /v/niggers here, it's better than this sub.

2
1

[–] CANCEL-CAT-FACTS 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

Actually, v/niggers gave me a free watermelon flair just for posting there, which you don't get in this shithole.

6
5

[–] WatDabney 6 points 5 points (+11|-6) ago 

This thread is hilarious.

I don't recall ever seeing such a vivid example of a bigot having an emotional meltdown over someone else's bigotry.

0
9

[–] endlessly_wandering [S] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Meltdown is a bit strong, don't you think? Am I not allowed to criticize without being accused of being a whiner at every turn?

3
1

[–] WatDabney 3 points 1 points (+4|-3) ago 

Of course you're allowed to criticize. It'd still be amusing, since you'd still be criticizing a thing that, in another context, you do, but it wouldn't have that same hilarious appeal of the vividly emotional rant you did post.

It's obvious throughout your posts on this thread that your view of this isn't calmly considered and rational - it's just rage. And that your rage is over someone else's bigotry is just a perfect little dollop of unintentional irony.

3
4

[–] Totentag 3 points 4 points (+7|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Honestly, before @RagBagger it was quiet around here, but mostly limited to intelligent discussion. My suggestion? @JMT or @politicorelig could implement a rule banning targeted anti-___ rhetoric, be it anti-Islam or anti-FSM.

For the time being, it appears RagBagger is the only real "problem" around.

0
1

[–] politicorelig 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

To respond to this issue, I have advertised for more mods. I think if myself or JMT take action it might be construed as the views of one person versus RagBagger. If we have a team (and the additions to the team take place after consultation with this sub) then I think it will have more legitimate authority to discuss and intervene in such situations.

With this in mind: https://voat.co/v/religion/comments/454236#submissionTop

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] endlessly_wandering [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I honestly don't have a problem with anti- religious posts, it's how he attempts to do it.

0
1

[–] Totentag 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I guess it's mostly just a matter of opinion. It seems to me that it tends to limit discussion to a binary "good guy VS bad guy" argument, where whichever side you're supporting is obviously the good guy.

Honestly, it's not an idea I would push exceptionally hard for, but that's partially because I'm liable to be virtually lynched for suggesting anything that smells like "censorship." ;D

4
3

[–] jaguar0405 4 points 3 points (+7|-4) ago 

The things he posts are ridiculous, but for their content, only some of which is factually incorrect. I haven't looked at his comments, so I can't speak to those.

If you want to see better discourse, why don't you try submitting better content, rather than just whinging?

However, I find it hilarious that a former member of /r/coontown and self-described racist cares so much.

2
6

[–] endlessly_wandering [S] 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Did you know that ad hominem is the second lowest form of disagreement? It is right above calling me a poopy head on Graham's hierarchy of disagreement.

The reason why I made a post is because the content shows up on v/all.

For the record, I am a current member of v/niggers.

2
2

[–] BrownMoses 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

It is right above calling me a poopy head on Graham's hierarchy of disagreement.

tips fedora

4
0

[–] simplexion 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

Where was the ad hominem? You are a self-described racist and you are whinging.

0
1

[–] endlessly_wandering [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I decided you are partly right. I'm going to submit content. It will help make this verse better.

3
-1

[–] RagBagger 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

Feel free to PROVE JUST ONE is factually inaccurate...

0
8

[–] endlessly_wandering [S] 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

The post about muhammad sucking penises is based on fabricated hadith, and thus are factually inaccurate as religious doctrine.

0
1

[–] whisky_cat 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This is the first time I clicked on this sub because under the circumstances I was certain it'd be full of bullshit (and no, I haven't read anything here and will ignore it). Hate to say it, but while I'm totally a Voater I understand the context of the website participants. Some subs will have incredible difficulty succeeding here.

edit: and I actually mis-clicked, going for /v/pics....

2
0

[–] ancientgoat 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

I disagree.

2
-1

[–] Crensch 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

a legitimate scholarly subject and replace it with retarded memes.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So, what you're saying is the rabid Harry Potter fan club can be the scholars of a legitimate scholarly subject?

[–] [deleted] 5 points -2 points (+3|-5) ago 

[Deleted]

0
6

[–] endlessly_wandering [S] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

The religious prohibition itself is on imitating non Muslims. The wig prohibition was by some unknown person who, even if credible, does not have to be religiously obeyed.

That's not the point though. The point is that the post is smut. Im not going to sit here and convince you not to mock things you don't agree with, but you must see that it is incredibly low brow and reeks of stupidity.

1
-1

[–] jaguar0405 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Im not going to sit here and convince you not to mock things you don't agree with

Good, because that is the point of ridicule. Which is why, one might say, this sub is a bit ridiculous. It is filled with quite a bit of well-earned ridicule.

[–] [deleted] 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

2
0

[–] RagBagger 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Bingo...

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)