Yahshua is the anointed physical genetic stock Israylite, brother of other Israylite men and women around the world, John 7:42, Rom. 1:3, 9:3-5, 2Tim. 2:8. Yahweh appointed him to be the savior, 1John 4:14. Raised him up from amongst the brethren, Deut. 18:15, Acts 3:22, 7:37. Taught him obedience by the things he suffered, Heb. 5:8. Born of the flesh, blood and nature of Abraham's children through Isaac and Jacob/Israyl, Heb.2:14-17, Rom.8:3, Gal. 4:4. The false messiahs proclaimed by so many did not come in the flesh, blood and nature of Abraham's seed as Yahshua the true messiah did.
2 John 1:7 "For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Yahshua Messiah
is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antimessiah.”
They therefore deny he is come in the flesh, blood and nature of Abraham's seed! They are therefore of Anti-Messiah, for they may claim he came in A flesh, but not the flesh like his brethren of physical Israyl! No, they proclaim the Babylonian messiah and many times don't even know it! "Strong delusion" indeed! He is our example, therefore he must have been like us in every way. When he was filled with the Spirit at his Baptism, this being the sign John the Baptizer was watching for, he set the example for all his brothers and sisters to do the same. He was a physical, genetic stock, pure blooded Israylite, and that is the remnant lineage to whom Paul limits the adoption, to cry "Abba, Father", Rom.8:15, 9:3-5. Yahshua is the Kinsman Redeemer, Acts 5:30-32, Luke 1:67-68.
I challenge ALL to read this article on the PAGAN VIRGIN BIRTH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] AngelofDeath [S] ago
Can you point out a location where the two house split is in reference where I fail to keep the distinction?
But, again, Yahudites are Israylites ... and many of the House of Judah were also taken in the Assyrian captivity, with the bulk of House of Israyl.
AND, I might point out, there are those that teach Yahshua did come from the tribe of Joseph and not Judah, as is commonly declared. Regardless to that, either way Yahshua, being of any tribe of Jacob makes him an Israylite.
[–] SerialLarper ago
It's not about location, it's about time. The distinction wasn't important before the separation of the northern and southern kingdoms, but it becomes more significant in the context of the lost tribes of Israel and the breaking of the brotherhood between Israel and Judah. The mission of the Messiah relates to the lost sheep of Israel, so there's some context for the rejection of Christian religion by the Yehudim.
[–] AngelofDeath [S] ago
JUDAH FORFEITED HIS SIGNET, BRACELETS AND STAFF TO TAMAR BECAUSE OF HIS WHORE MONGERING.
Esau sold his Birthright for a morsel of bread and soup. Judah Pledged his Signet, Bracelets, and Staff for the services of a Harlot. Esau never regained his Birthright! Judah never redeemed his pledge!
They've tried to SEIZE THE INHERITANCE in many ways over time. Both Esau and Judah ...
SHILOH is a HIM, and is the UNIFYING ELEMENT between the Houses of Israyl and Judah. BUT, since the Sceptre was PROMISED AND PROPHESIED to "DEPART FROM JUDAH" when "SHILOH" ... "HIM" ... came, Judah no longer has the Kingdom, Sceptre, nor right to claim rule.
FROM JOSEPH was the Shepherd, the STONE OF ISRAYL.
The Root of David OVERCAME THE LION OF JUDAH.
David was not of the tribe of JUDAH ...
H673
אֶפְרָתִי
'ephrâthı̂y
ef-rawth-ee'
Patrial from H672; an Ephrathite or an Ephraimite: - Ephraimite, Ephrathite.
He was a KING ruling in JUDAH that was a descendent of JOSEPH. You are correct that it is about time. It matters. This is BEFORE the TWO HOUSE SPLIT.
There are also TWO BETHLEHEMs. Bethlehem Ephratah and Bethlehem Judah ... one is NORTH of Jerusalem, one is South of Jerusalem. I've seen it on a single map, ever. Expect a conspiracy to hid these facts. We are talking about attempted THEFT of the Kingdom of Yahweh!
There is much more to the issue.
JESSE was an EPHRATHITE.
DAVID was the son of Jesse
You mean the EVIDENCE is lacking on the JUDAH issue Paul??? Yes!
Not that I agree with everything in this sermon, noor the site in general. The one speaking has passed away a few years back, Eugene 'Buddy' Johnson.
http://oneyahweh.com/w/index.php/2010/02/06/judah-and-joseph-introduction/
http://oneyahweh.com/w/wp-content/list_yo_files_user_folders/Sermons/temp/Short%20Take%20Intro/12104%20%20Was%20David%20Of%20Jewish%20Blood%20%2002-04-2012.lite.mp3
http://oneyahweh.com/w//wp-content/list_yo_files_user_folders/SermonArchives/2002%20Sermons/202170a%20%20%20Ephratah%20%201-07-02%20.lite.mp3
http://oneyahweh.com/w//wp-content/list_yo_files_user_folders/SermonArchives/2002%20Sermons/202170b%20%20%20Ephratah%20%201-08-02%20%20.lite.mp3
http://oneyahweh.com/w//wp-content/list_yo_files_user_folders/SermonArchives/2002%20Sermons/202170c%20%20%20Ephrata%20.lite.mp3
http://oneyahweh.com/w//wp-content/list_yo_files_user_folders/SermonArchives/2002%20Sermons/202170d%20%20%20Ephratah.lite.mp3
There are TWO MAIN enemies of truth I would like to point out. "Those that say they are jews and are not", and "MOTHER OF HARLOTS" ... including her daughter churches. This latter is the source of what you term "christian religion". The wolves DID indeed enter in and devour the original flock ... then gnostics ... then Constantine packaged and formulated this paganized abomination into a state religion. Later the daughters split off in the form of orthodox and protestants of various ilks and at various times, not just the traditional 'protestant reformation'. The daughters never returned to the ORIGINAL faith all the way. That would be Yahwehism. Yahshua himself, Paul, Peter, John, and the obedient patriarchs and prophets were Yahwehists.
As to "Yehudim" rejecting "christianity" ... I do too ... as commanded even in the New Testament. Remember, there is a conspiracy against Yahweh and has been since the beginning. He actually uses it! That is what Paul is telling us in 2 Thes. 2.