You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Doglegwarrior 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Good point theres zero first hand sources from that time. No original letters etc. Ive read about the nicean confernce but it has as much first person evidence as the bible. I get your point i cant prove the nicean conferemce and ypu cant prove the original bible letters.

2
-2

[–] Anarchy99 [S] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

All I can show you is what's in the Bible, and assess whether it's true or not by how I understand the words. Most people use words they do not understand what they are saying. Anybody can write anything. The Bible warns you so "woe unto the scribes" most people do not understand what they read because they were not taught properly.

0
1

[–] Doglegwarrior 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Who wrote that? Why do you believe something that was written from 2000 years ago approximatly? Do you know if the many translations from.different languages mean what they mean today what they meant back then. And again everything in the new testement is letters that were passed back and forth secomd hand about what jesus said and did nothing in the new testment was written down by jesus it is all second hand then translationsnof that second hand material? And you are passing wisdom on to me from that source?