[–] ZenAtheist 0 points 94 points (+94|-0) ago 

HTML is not a programming language, it is a markup language. That is not coding.

[–] Teutonic-Pride 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

[–] Gigglestick 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[–] Weasel_Soup 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

It's not even well done...

[–] SchwazaRifleCoffeeCo 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It's pathetic. My favorite was a p tag(why?) within h1.

[–] acheron2012 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Came here to post that.

TRUTH

[–] watts2db 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I was going to say this as well fuck these ppl are retarded

[–] WakkoWarner 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Is that even valid HTML?

[–] shmuklidooha [S] 1 points 26 points (+27|-1) ago 

It seems technically correct, except that <style> should go within <head>. There's a whole bunch of errors with regards to best practice though.

[–] Adminstrater 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I don't think I have ever seen anyone use a semi-colon to separate attributes in an tag, and I didn't notice until I wrote it out but it is also missing an equal sign.

<table width "100%; align="center">

...also missing a closing paragraph tag. And of course the bad practice of using both inline CSS and internal sheets.

But she is using Notepad++, so whoever started teaching her is doing it right.

[–] obvious-throwaway- 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It seems technically correct

It's riddled with inaccuracies, I'll assume it's part of the joke. Tables wrapped in tables, "h1" instead of "th" for header row. Having CSS and then defining styles in HTML. Unnecessary tabs, no header/title, missing column span, referring to formatting/styling as coding and so on.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <meta charset="UTF-8">
  <style>
    table { border-collapse:collapse; }
    table.main { border:1px solid black;text-align:center;width:100%; }
    table,td,th { border:3px solid #17375E; }
    p.sansserif { font-family:Calibri,sans-serif; }
    .left { text-align:left; }
    .silver { color:silver; }
  </style>
  <title>Title</title>
</head>
<body>
  <table class="main">
    <tr>    
      <th class="left" colspan="4"><p class="sansserif">Title</p></th>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td class="silver"><p class="sansserif">Page 1</td>
      <td class="silver"><p class="sansserif">Page 1</td>
      <td class="silver"><p class="sansserif">Page 1</td>
      <td class="silver"><p class="sansserif">Page 1</td>
    </tr>
  </table>
</body>
</html>

[–] elcob32 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Those tables are not correct either. There should be rows and they should not be nested in that way. Also the H1 tag should not be where it is.

[–] go1dfish 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No.

table is not a valid child of table

h1 isn't a valid child of table either.

One of those table tags isn't closed. IDK if this is technically invalid but it's not good.

The missing closing tags for <p> is technically valid but bad practice (especially when you are treating them like a container here for styling, wtf).

same with the use of "bgcolor"

The CSS looks valid.

That said, browsers are built to be very accepting of bad markup, it will probably render roughly what she is expecting here.

[–] HandsomeOmega 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

One of those table tags isn't closed. IDK if this is technically invalid but it's not good.

It's not valid.

[–] speedisavirus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Never knows what flies with how loose some browsers are on standards. Either way that whole thing is a pile of shit.

[–] SchwazaRifleCoffeeCo 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

haha I didn't realize the h1 was within table...

[–] ilikeskittles 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Scary isn't it? These people vote. That's what scares me the most.

[–] WhitePaladin 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

And they make babies. A lot more than you.

What could go wrong.

[–] ilikeskittles 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Idiocracy. They'll be watering plants with Gatorade before the end of the next decade.

[–] TheTrigger 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

thnx I'll have nightmares now knowing airplane software is written by chicks

[–] ilikeskittles 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I actually don't think any of it is. That shit has to work. If it was it was debugged by a man.

[–] saarsaar 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

HTML is basically knitting

[–] enginedriver13 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Beg to differ--knitting requires a lot more organization of different patterns and thus, mental awareness, than writing shitty html or dumbass CSS trash. Which is why most woman knitters don't design and layout their own knitting patterns but use other people's designs and layouts.

[–] bman0321 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Who says girls can't knit?

[–] TuxInATornado 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

So the story here is taking a photo of your screen instead of ctrl-alt-print screen (takes just the active window)? Yes I think a lot of people lack enthusiasm about their tools. I think men i work with in general spend a lot more time fiddling with the features their tools make available to them. No different than when my girlfriend wants to use the table saw. She hasnt any idea what that junk on the top does so she takes it off then pinches the plywood while ripping it and gives herself a nice bruise across her hip.

[–] SchwazaRifleCoffeeCo 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

Also the markup is absolute garbage and invalid.

[–] shmuklidooha [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

There's plenty of ways to print screen. I use the MS snipping tool since I can take screenshots and crop in one go.

I think men i work with in general spend a lot more time fiddling with the features their tools make available to them.

I think this applies to many things. Very often when I'm explaining how to do something to my wife, she only really cares about the step-by-step process, rather than the theory and reasoning behind each step. It's a very pragmatic approach to take, but it stops her from taking the initiative to 'discover' how to expand on the process.

[–] TrumpTheGodEmperor 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Use LightShot, so much more useful then the MS crap

[–] IquitzuOcha 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah. It's a lame post.

[–] carlip 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

why go through the trouble of writing Calibri for the paragraph class if you're just going to use the an in-line style call for sansserif... ON EVERY FUCKING LINE

[–] TheTrigger 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This post is making me want to inspect the code on most feminist websites. I bet their javascript has plenty of fun "features" to be discovered.

[–] zmej420 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I used to be a fan of Ruby until I started seeing the professional code written in it by SJWs. The problem with a loose dynamic language like Ruby, is when you have 20 ways to do something and infinite ways to write your code, you have that many ways to fuck everything up. It's basically Perl 2.0 but this time with SJWs. The only upshot is IME, Rubycunts seem to be into unit testing more often than Nodetards.

[–] BrainStemNemesis 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Who says girls can't indent?

[–] SerialChiller 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Are there really people who write html <table> spec by hand in 2019?

[–] shmuklidooha [S] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

It's used for emails to comply with old versions of outlook.

[–] speedisavirus 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You should see what my idiot boss did for a green field project we have. Yes, at least someone is using tables by hand in 2019. He is one of them. For page layout. Not even tabulated data.

[–] zmej420 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

sometimes that's the boss you want though, if it's all about money. "Hey I need you to make this complicated page displaying a bunch of data, I know it'll be a bunch of work so I'll give you a couple weeks before it's due." Me: spends an hour using a templating language to generate the page, waits a week, sends him the generated html and bill for 40 hours of work.

I haven't done exactly this, but I have done similar things where I use metaprogramming concepts to generate PHP or javascript, then the generated code is what I submit through git. It saves me time and makes me look good. If I showed my "boss" how I did it, I'd have to spend more hours educating him than if I had wrote the code by hand.

[–] Saturday405 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Like @shmuklidooha, I use it in emails.

[–] blargh55 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

If it works it works

load more comments ▼ (26 remaining)