You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] freed00m ago 

I hate Linked lists, that I agree with you on.

UML by hand is also waste of time in my eyes.

But what about finding a node in a tree? I would use recursion, for high quality demand we have MISRA and stuff like MISRA.

1
0

[–] lmkevin [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Yeah thinking on it, I knew that recursion does have actual use (hense the 90%), you can't get away from recursion when dealing with trees.

0
0

[–] freed00m ago 

I don't think you "can't" but I just do it with recursion. The other memory ease method usually linked lists :D and that I hate more. All MISRA sets should be satisfied with linked lists. There you go :D