Posted by: kcamstar
Posting time: 4 years ago on 12/18/2016 5:15:46 PM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 3/19/2017 10:00:00 AM
Views: 187
SCP: 12
13 upvotes, 1 downvotes (93% upvoted it)
~51 user(s) here now
Everything programming! Language agnostic subvoat, general programming talk. Educational and programming technology related submissions are welcomed!
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. Donald Knuth
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
Donald Knuth
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived Why physicists still use Fortran (moreisdifferent.com)
submitted 4 years ago by kcamstar
[–] grillmaster 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) 4 years ago
Can confirm the article. Meteorology student who worked with Fortran and C++ last year and Fortran was much easier for what I was doing.
[–] vaginitis20161116 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 4 years ago
for(i = 0; i < nrows; i++){
Fix your fucking HTML, assholes!
[–] kcamstar [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 4 years ago
You're right, I didn't notice that... and I'm an old FORTRAN programmer.
Sort: Top
[–] grillmaster 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Can confirm the article. Meteorology student who worked with Fortran and C++ last year and Fortran was much easier for what I was doing.
[–] vaginitis20161116 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Fix your fucking HTML, assholes!
[–] kcamstar [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You're right, I didn't notice that... and I'm an old FORTRAN programmer.