It is spreading awfully quickly amongst the NFL. It has endorsements from public officials. So what's behind all this?
It's already been pointed out by our community (at the very least) that kneeling is a very universal behavior of submission, or genuflection. At first, yeah, it was a bunch of drain bamaged niggers. But then a coach started in on it. And the white players started. A few National Anthem singers started. And then Rico Lavelle did this. Black power gesture, right? But wait a minute! It's been used for something else, too!
It's doublethink, goats. Get the people to raise their fists in the communist salute, while at the same time, genuflecting to... what, exactly? Not the flag, no. No, it's what the flag represents - a powerful state.
Consider: When you stand proud and erect before the flag, you show respect, but also strength. It is a gesture that demonstrates that the strength of the nation a flag represents is born of its people. The State is strong, because the State is of the People, and the People are strong. That's how I see it.
But when you kneel before the flag, what are you doing? You are showing deference. You supplicate yourself for who or what you acknowledge to be your better. It's no secret amongst voaters ✡who✡ controls the 6 (Why does that number keep popping up with ✡them✡? 6 media corporations, 6 gorillion, the Six-Days War...) companies that control the thousands of channels on television.
So, what would be the point of leading the public to supplicate themselves before the symbol of the nation? At this point, the question is rhetorical, but I will continue anyway. I would like to remind the community (again, it's been posted recently) of this quote by Ariel Shannon:
EVERY TIME WE DO SOMETHING, YOU TELL ME AMERICANS WILL DO THIS AND WILL DO THAT. I WANT TO TELL YOU SOMETHING VERY CLEAR: DON'T WORRY ABOUT AMERICAN PRESSURE ON ISRAEL;
WE, THE JEWISH PEOPLE, CONTROL AMERICA. AND THE AMERICANS KNOW IT.
Putting it all together, the goal of this particular social engineering campaign could well be the first overt assertion of control. The United States is already in the position of global beat cop. Putting aside discussion on the ethics of that role, when a nation in that position is under the control of a cabal that has an established mission of world control, you arrive at the current global situation. But, when that peacekeeping nation sheds its identity as a republic that cherishes, above all else, the right to express oneself, and instead becomes a nation of people that willingly, knowingly, and happily submit themselves to the authority of the state, well, that global peacekeeper will very quickly become a global enforcer that serves the interests of... what?
What would they (we) be enforcing on the world? Why, our ideals, of course. And what would those ideals be? Communism.
That's where I think #takeaknee is headed.
Now, I conceded you could very easily make the case that the US role on the world stage is already global enforcer. But I would disagree. Right now, the ✡parasites✡ are still hiding their power level. So everything we do is not based on enforcement yet. Right now, it's about positioning. Think of chess. Even though your rook could have easily wiped out their bishop, and gained a quick advantage, it would shatter the grand strategy.
But, when all the pieces are in position, then ✡they✡ will activate their endgame, and at that point, we would become the enforcer I'm describing. Checkmate.