2
92

[–] CervicalStrike [S] 2 points 92 points (+94|-2) ago  (edited ago)

/pol/ is hard at work digging through these as we speak. One anon already found this.

The fucking Rothschilds man!

EDIT: OY VEY

2
46

[–] Drenki 2 points 46 points (+48|-2) ago 

Wow, that email reads like a love letter.

MISS YOU

I would love to see you

Much love, H

Xoxox

Shillary confirmed for lesbo.

3
31

[–] CervicalStrike [S] 3 points 31 points (+34|-3) ago 

[–] [deleted] 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] Dereliction 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Should we start referring to her as Slick Hilly?

0
3

[–] Dereliction 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

They're chummy because Lady de Rothschild has been a zealous supporter since Hillary's earliest days as a political mouthpiece for the rich and powerful. She is one of the major donors who supported the Clintons in every federal race, including Slick Hilly's 2008 presidential campaign.

It's safe to say that the woman is a feminist, but I'll leave off applying the "raging" adjective for those who might be better informed about her.

1
20

[–] Trevelyan-s_corn 1 points 20 points (+21|-1) ago 

These are the emails she printed and gave, not the +30K she deleted before they could access them?

1
15

[–] CervicalStrike [S] 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I can only assume that's the case, though I have no idea. But with that large of a number available, even if they have been filtered, I am hopeful that the scrubbing was not 100% effective. I'm curious to see what /pol/ can find by the end of the day.

1
13

[–] AlkaiserSoze 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I've been saying it for years and been called a kook, a loony, and a conspiracy nut. The Rothschilds and the Rockefellers straight up rule the world as a shadow committee. It's hard to tell for the most part but the signs are there. When Deus Ex came out, lots of people thought it was far fetched, what with references to the Trilateral Commission, FEMA, etc. Now-a-days, it isn't so far-fetched to see a bleak future which is controlled by corporations.

While most history books will tell you that the Rothschild family was at its height in the 19th century, this simply isn't true. Their fortune may have been overly apparent back then but as the world progressed into modern times they shifted their influence from overt to covert. Through funding, backroom deals, and corporate acquisition through shell corporations, many modern companies pay heed to them in one form or another whether those companies are aware of it or not.

In modern times, it is consider anti-semetic to say this as it relates to aggressive Zionism. I'm not trying to pull an Amalek and say "kill all the Jews!" but people have to realize that by controlling the banking industry you effectively have the world by the throat and groin. Keep in mind, however, the original Rothschilds were very pro-Zionism and quite vocal about it.

So how does all of this tie in to Hillary? Well, the evidence presented here is that she has close ties to the Rothschilds and I feel that this makes it clear that she is 100% in the pocket of one of the wealthiest and influential families on the planet. As we move toward a globalist state of economy, who do you think will be at the top? The bankers, as they control the flow of large sums of capital. By obtaining a United States President, this paves the way for a controlling monopoly held by a single family. I truly think this could be a realistic outcome.

ADDENDUM: Downvote if you wish but provide a reply as to why. In all honesty, I would rather be a kook than a wiseman for on something like this is it far better to be wrong than it is to be right. Perhaps my wording makes it sound all diabolical and crazy but I would ask how you could phrase such a situation or rather, explain how such a situation is literally impossible.

0
1

[–] TheAwesomeDude9001 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I've always had one thought/question when it comes to this sort of thing: Why would they let information on them out? If they control everything, why not stop anyone, even on the web, from saying anything about it? Some sort of 'filter'? Why would they allow an images like this one: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CAYAuj4WMAAVyuc.jpg to exist?

2
4

[–] Men13 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

What's wrong with that email? Other than the Rothschild name that is.

1
10

[–] Adminstrater 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

You have to read between the lines and decrypt the hidden message where they plan to meet up and eat babies.

2
44

[–] CervicalStrike [S] 2 points 44 points (+46|-2) ago  (edited ago)

This is going to provide so much ammo for The Donald.

"Not sure if you were able to catch my interview with President Clinton last night on Piers Morgan Tonight. Do you think calling Secretary Clinton the greatest Secretary of State of all time shows just a touch of my bias? Pres. Clinton is incredible. I hope our current president, who is as busy as can be, gets to see it. I did my best to flatten Romney in a cool kind of way, and talked about how Donald Trump was uncool was the least I could do. Below is a link in case you missed it."

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/20548

DISHONEST MEDIA

1
17

[–] luckyguy 1 points 17 points (+18|-1) ago 

These are public emails. These are the result of FOIA requests. Wikileaks is just kind enough to put them in one place. They aren't really a leak.

0
3

[–] Groomzilla 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Look at them back there. So dishonest, bunch of liars the press are.

0
1

[–] derfherdez 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The date is 2012....

Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:04:35 -0400

Was Trump even talking about running in 2012?

Is the whole thing a big show?

0
3

[–] CervicalStrike [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

No, but he was endorsing Romney at the time.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 31 points (+31|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
18

[–] Drenki 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

Hillary Rodham Clinton 2017.

0
15

[–] WhiteSoIMustBeRacist 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Hillary Rodent Clinton 2017

0
18

[–] Bubbha 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

Multiple accounts, maybe. To filter different emails from different persons.

0
1

[–] EatingSteak 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

That address is hilarious. I thought I was playing Counterstrike for a minute

0
1

[–] m0t- 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

*stumpdU::d0n ;-÷=> {gurl}hr0d17

<<D-D-DDOMMMINATING>>

1
24

[–] OhBlindOne 1 points 24 points (+25|-1) ago  (edited ago)

She's still not going to get indicted.

Edit: Indited replaced with indicted. Thanks @Ekiph

0
10

[–] Ekiph 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

indicted*

0
10

[–] RoninSnowman 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

I respect the correction, but the guy is blind, btw.

0
3

[–] OhBlindOne 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Wow, I'm amazed I made such a silly mistake. thanks for the correction.

Edit: yet another typo fixed...

0
3

[–] oooooo 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

She's slicker than slick willy himself.

0
4

[–] Bubbha 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

How do think he got so slick?

3
14

[–] Rummel 3 points 14 points (+17|-3) ago 

While Anonymous is playing tiddlywinks with Trump, Julian Assange just gave Trump the oval office keys

0
9

[–] BentAxel 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Yeah, I don't understand that one. That's not in line with Anonymous. They are for anarchy and disruption. Maybe something done to look like Anonymous. Perhaps the Clinton Campaign?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
6

[–] gregorypeckerwood 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

They've oobviously been co-opted.

0
3

[–] Dereliction 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Definitely the Clinton campaign. From here on out, the dirty tricks factor will go into high gear.

0
2

[–] Gamerdog6482 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

For the two millionth time this decade: Anonymous is not a person.

They're barely even an organization at this point.

/pol/ (which the media often terms "Anonymous", although there hasn't been a real hacker in /pol/ in decades) loves Trump because /pol/ is filled with literal Nazis, extreme-right-wing conspiracy theorists, and general fascism circlejerks.

The "Anonymous" that you're thinking of died a decade ago. Most who self-title themselves that in hacker circles are FBI seeders and basically everybody with a lick of sense realizes this.

1
1

[–] Iamcheesebread 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

I'll bet his intentions were to give Sanders a chance, or at the very least deal a blow to Clinton.

9
7

[–] Harvo 9 points 7 points (+16|-9) ago 

Spoiler alert: there is nothing in these emails that anyone will care about.

6
-2

[–] EatingSteak 6 points -2 points (+4|-6) ago 

Props to Wikileaks for making the data available, but there's no way I'm going through tens of thousands of emails just to see if there's anything juicy.

4
-2

[–] Harvo 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago 

Let me save you the time...there is nothing here whatsoever. These emails have been scrutinized a million times. There is nothing but the ramblings of an old lady.

0
6

[–] bloodguard 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Since the server itself was insecure as feck you just know someone has the full un-redacted set. I wonder how high a crowd funded bounty would have to be to convince them to put the whole mess online. I'd be in for a hundred or so.

0
5

[–] antiplebbitor 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I'd go in 30BTC on that.

0
3

[–] PardiGras 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

30 bitcoins? So 12.5k?!

0
1

[–] Dumb_Comment_Bot 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

If you had it would you? Knowing you would disappear overnight if you did?

1
6

[–] ScreaminMime 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Do these include the ones that Senators investigating didn't have enough security clearance to view?

0
8

[–] CowWithBeef 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I don't think so. Wikileaks claims they got them through FOIA requests.

load more comments ▼ (17 remaining)