This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] RedditIsPropaganda23 3 points 0 points 3 points (+3|-3) ago (edited ago)
Presidents should NOT be kings. Just ask George Washington.
We don't need SJW internet censors like Trump to start WW3. Did you hear he would let Israel attack Iran because he and Netanyahu are good friends?
[–] CervicalStrike 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Trump saying that he wants to shut off parts of the internet in the context of ISIS recruitment on Twitter hardly makes him an SJW. He clarified that he was talking about geography, limiting access to Syria/Iraq/etc.
[–] CatNamedJava ago (edited ago)
That's what they said about the no knock raids only will be used against drug gangs, that's what they said when the give NSA free reign, only will be used against terrorists.
[–] RedditIsPropaganda23 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Of course, the internet is not organized into "areas" that can be switched on and off. The internet was deliberately designed to be a globally integrated network, with everyone on the planet having access to content anywhere in the world — something our "brilliant people" would have told Trump if he'd actually asked any of them.
If we really wanted to exclude ISIS from the US internet, there is a model of how to do it: China's Great Firewall. That's the censorship regime the Chinese government uses to try to keep subversive ideas like democracy and human rights out of their country. In principle, we could adopt the same tactics here in the United States, building a virtual wall around the United States and filtering all of the information flowing in and out of the country to try to prevent jihadists from communicating with Americans.
And for this to work, we'd have to not only prevent ISIS members from posting on US websites but also prevent impressionable Americans from browsing websites the US government deems too ISIS-friendly. This would, of course, be a massive violation of the First Amendment, and Americans are unlikely to stand for the US government deciding which websites they're allowed to read.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2015/12/16/10303256/donald-trump-internet-dumb
[–] Truly ago
Not a big trump fan, but cervical only said the "demeanor of a king". I think many would argue that GW had the demeanor of a king in many of his actions.
As for Israel, I'd prefer we not put ourselves in any position where we "let" a country attack another- if two countries have cause to war against each other, that is between them for the most part.
[–] RedditIsPropaganda23 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago (edited ago)
Except a conflict is NOT just between 2 countries because of ALLIES. Iran is allied with Russia and China. Israel with the US.
Trump is a serious World War 3 threat. He's much too arrogant and ego-centered to be mentioned in the same sentence as. George Washington.