This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
Sort: Top
[–] Grumpy_Old_Man 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
Don't forget. She left the White House "dead broke." And by "dead broke" she meant they didn't want to spend the money on solid gold plumbing fixtures in their new house in New York.
[–] Meechum 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Yes her top contributors are the ones that destroyed our economy and were rewarded for it.
[–] [deleted] 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
[–] flyawayhigh 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Another negative piece about Hillary is back on top of v/politics, and as usual, it's from a Republican partisan source.
The bad taste is hypocrisy. National Review has no problem with the speaking fees unless it is a Democrat, and particularly Hillary Clinton taking them. In fact, National Review's tendency is to support these "private" deals.
I know from being here that most of us in the v/politics section of Voat are independents, so why are we letting ourselves be used in such a transparently partisan way? Honest critical pieces about Hillary can certainly be found. It's not like the partisan sites are the only ones reporting on her. In fact, the nonpartisan sites do a much better job.
Take a look at some other National Review articles which you can find in the search engine.
"Dick Cheney: CIA Torture Report ‘Full of Crap’" -- the site does nothing but repeat Cheney's assertions.
"Bush Didn’t Lie." This one's rich. National Review still peddling WMDs!
Seriously, you can't find something critical of Hillary that's not a partisan hit piece?
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)