0
136

[–] arrjayjee 0 points 136 points (+136|-0) ago 

Maybe if Fox News did their job people would know what the TPP is.

0
121

[–] peacegnome 0 points 121 points (+121|-0) ago 

They are doing their job perfectly, we just saw a shining example.

0
8

[–] 9-11 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

i cant believe it was so blatant - advertisers demand no discussion of it - so fox complies

[–] [deleted] 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
8

[–] adrianN 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

I need TPP for my bunghole

1
2

[–] BigSmeez 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

I thought it was Titty Pumping Penises

0
4

[–] Lag-wagon 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

"obama trade"

0
4

[–] makaw 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

No cause then people would dislike it. And they want you to like this one.

But net neutrality? That's Obama's "internet welfare" program...

0
3

[–] Lintel 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

They do. If their job is not telling people what the TPP is.

0
94

[–] NuttstoButts247 0 points 94 points (+94|-0) ago 

"Say trade deal, TPP would take a long time to explain"

Well maybe you should stop being a fear-mongering publicity whore and DO YOUR FUCKING JOB.

Sorry, I assumed you were a journalist reporting on current events. I forgot you are a talking model reading Murdoch-Approved bullshit.

0
44

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 44 points (+44|-0) ago 

The biggest trade deal in world history is not important enough to cover in MSM.

Okay then

0
15

[–] CowWithBeef 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

It's too big to cover.

1
8

[–] akornblatt 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

Sorry, I assumed you were a journalist reporting on current events. I forgot you are a talking model reading Murdoch-Approved bullshit.

on Fox News you assumed this?

0
0

[–] MedicalMountainGoat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

But that is her job.

0
0

[–] Quawonk 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It's not too hard to explain at all:

Corporate takeover of the world.

Simple. But they don't want the people knowing that truth.

1
76

[–] ArchangelleShe [S] 1 points 76 points (+77|-1) ago 

At least they're upfront about their TPP blackout.

1
46

[–] Moonbat 1 points 46 points (+47|-1) ago 

Right as she says "Don't ever say TPP on this show again" she looks off camera. At her corporate masters, one can only assume? This video kind of gave me a chill.

0
4

[–] jeffwingersballs 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's just big enough to cover up.

0
3

[–] Baseborn 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Next up: ISIS and what you need to be afraid of for realzies.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 28 points (+28|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] Lobotomy 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

If you can't convey the essentials of any idea in a single paragraph, then that is a problem with your own ability to articulate.

1
0

[–] RedditDead2005-2015 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

What would be the purpose of explaining the TPP deal now considering it has already passed? But when Congress didn't want the Iran nuclear deal to pass, it was on the news 24/7 scrutinizing every little detail which would make the deal seem bad.

0
0

[–] Bindlestiff 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

We should crowd fund a documentary about it and get that pretty blond girl that did the red pill to make it.

0
20

[–] Atwood 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

We need a hard reboot of news media in general. "those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable"

0
8

[–] Moonbat 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I agree with you in spirit but imo the reboot is already happening. We're here talking about it, after all. I don't think all is lost, just yet, and there are plenty of news sources to choose from. In the last decade newspaper after venerable old newspaper is going out of business. Fox News we may hate but even FNN is a new thing, relatively speaking. In historical terms things are changing at lightning speed, and the internet is changing everything. I'm optimistic!

0
5

[–] Atwood 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

IMO we are experiencing something of a soft reboot not a cold one. Given time the financial elite will find their wings in this new environment and manipulate things just as easily as before. Net machinations are on the rise and show no sign of losing traction, while, those who fight for it (the web) are slowly being whittled down and drowned out by age old distractionary//rope a dope//bread and circus. All of this being said I am optimistic too, (sometimes I have to temper mine with spiced rum and coffee!) Please feel free to DM me on this or other subjects, I appreciate the thoughtful reply @Moonbat.

[[Thoughts//postulations on white nose syndrome?]]

0
0

[–] ohgodanewacct 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I think the media revolution holds a lot of promise for societies, national and global, but the toppling of the MSM entirely, without replacements of equal resources and repute, could land us all in a cesspool of Truthiness over Truth. Its not like the MSM is already suffering from a lack of Truth, but if they go altogether, i think no one (or average joe at least) will know which way is north or south to start with.

0
0

[–] Hugh_Cohen 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Seriously. It's like the states trying to pass ag-gag laws. That's just going to piss off the ALF or people who really care about animals and cost farmers and states more in the long run because of property destruction, etc.

0
11

[–] cyks 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Trade deal isn't even the biggest aspect of the TPP. It takes nearly no excessive time to say it is an overseas partnership. To say it is a trade deal is to dumb it down far beyond any NWO rhetoric. It makes the U.S.A. less sovereign and this is their strategy to keep the majority of the audience ignorant.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
7

[–] ObviouslyAHuman 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Probably why she looked off camera. A "oh shit" moment.

load more comments ▼ (20 remaining)