This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Brashmonkey 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Plus the kinds of things the Geneva convention forbids are the sort of things that if left unchecked can lead to serious long term hatred, which leads to reoccurring conflict that only builds
[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The ideas behind the Geneva conventions were created under a lens shaped by a millennium of war between states being armed disputes between kings, but after World War II, it's nigh-impossible for most of us to see war without some deep moral dimension. Extending protections to the armies of opposing lords is a simple cost-benefit analysis when it means getting those same benefits for your own in a war over who gets the oaken bucket this year, but when war starts to take on a "we're good, they're evil" tone 100% of the time, it becomes harder and harder to justify holding back against the demons.
[–] akuta ago
Which is precisely the point that the media plays in this whole issue over the last 60 years. War has been glorified and the "enemies" are always "the bad guys."
[–] AlphaWookie 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Really the tribes wiped away by Genghis Khan will never ever get a chance to make war again. The Native Americans will never wage war again against the US, the land is now secure. None of the tribes that resisted the Islamic expansion in the Middle east will never make war again. The Carthaginians will never make war again. Can you name any of the tribes that the Egyptian Empire crushed? Even for its sort period of time Alexander the Great secured Europe and spread civilization through much of the near east and secured a future for Greece into modernity. Overwhelming aggression against your enemy means they can never make war again. History is filled with thousands of tribes and kingdoms that will never be remembered who's names are unknown only the Empires that crushed and secured there peace through violence survived for any amount of time and influenced world history.