You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
30

[–] b0ard2death 0 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Is he the only person not attacking our right to encryption right now? Not to mention how blatantly clear it's become that none of our nsa intelligence could spot these two radical people buying up guns and flying in and out of the country?

Why can't he be more popular! Even I don't agree with every last thing he says, but he does seem to be a dim light in a dark field.

0
8

[–] CarlosShyamalan 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Sanders is absolutely clear on his stance on mass surveilance. Paul is not the only one fighting the good fight, but as of now all the leading candidates dont give a flying shit about the people.

0
2

[–] b0ard2death 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I agree, and honestly I think Sanders could be a good candidate, way way better than Clinton. I disagree with almost all of his policies, I think his economic plan is terrible, but I believe he's honest and not someone's puppet, unlike almost everyone else. Him, Paul, and Trump all seem to be honest and consistent at least.

Edit: another big problem I have with him though is his gun control stance. I'm very pro gun, banning assault weapons doesn't stop bad people from using them. It didn't stop them in Paris, it didn't stop them in California, and Chicago is a mess despite strict gun regulations.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] b0ard2death 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It's Ron 2012 all over again then?

1
1

[–] foltaisaprovenshill 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Trump among them - wants to shut down the Internet because he's afraid of ISIS. What a pussy.

0
0

[–] FriedFood100 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Cruz seems pretty good.

0
1

[–] b0ard2death 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I personally don't like him, but I'd take him over Christie or Clinton. I find it particularly ironic that Republicans that were asking for Obamas birth certificate are so willing to accept a Canadian as their candidate. Also from what I last read, it's still unclear if he technically can be president, but no one is making a fuss about it...yet.

Edit: to be clear I wasn't referencing you or anyone here, just that it was such a big deal 5 years ago, and now no one is saying anything. Personally I don't care about place of birth for a candidate.