This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Cato_Minor 3 points 2 points 5 points (+5|-3) ago
I really like both of them. Bernie Sanders doesn't pander to anyone and is as real as a politician can get, but I wish he understood economics a bit more. Rand Paul panders a bit too much(understandable considering the religious right has a say in whether or not he is even nominated), but has a decent understanding of economic theory. Either way I hope both are nominated in their respective party. It would make for an exciting election and much better than Hillary and Bush.
[–] Agedwithaview 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
agree that Paul versus Sanders would make for an interesting (entertaining) election but would challenge the criticism of Sander's economic understanding)
Contrast the current status of Kansas' economic situation with that of California. One state's economy is growing and vibrant while one has stagnated and is producing huge deficits despite slashing social and school program funding.
[–] Cato_Minor ago
We could compare Texas and Michigan. One states economy is growing and vibrant, while one has stagnated and is producing huge deficits despite increasing social and school program funding.
[–] SlappyHo 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Sanders v Paul would be an intelligent, honest, and informative debate. This is why it will never happen.