You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

3
2

[–] Cato_Minor 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago 

I really like both of them. Bernie Sanders doesn't pander to anyone and is as real as a politician can get, but I wish he understood economics a bit more. Rand Paul panders a bit too much(understandable considering the religious right has a say in whether or not he is even nominated), but has a decent understanding of economic theory. Either way I hope both are nominated in their respective party. It would make for an exciting election and much better than Hillary and Bush.

0
2

[–] Agedwithaview 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

agree that Paul versus Sanders would make for an interesting (entertaining) election but would challenge the criticism of Sander's economic understanding)

Contrast the current status of Kansas' economic situation with that of California. One state's economy is growing and vibrant while one has stagnated and is producing huge deficits despite slashing social and school program funding.

0
0

[–] Cato_Minor ago 

We could compare Texas and Michigan. One states economy is growing and vibrant, while one has stagnated and is producing huge deficits despite increasing social and school program funding.

0
2

[–] SlappyHo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Sanders v Paul would be an intelligent, honest, and informative debate. This is why it will never happen.