4
18

[–] TahTahBur 4 points 18 points (+22|-4) ago  (edited ago)

She should join snowden in exile?

Edit: my comment was only a question to the title

[–] [deleted] 14 points 21 points (+35|-14) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

2
15

[–] lissencarak 2 points 15 points (+17|-2) ago 

I'm guessing the that other site exodus continues. It's like when Californians migrate, they bring their bad policies with them.

3
3

[–] Aaaron 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago 

You bring up good points, I don't know why you're getting downvoted, everything you said is 100% true. It's not like you even injected your opinion or personal politics, just laying out the facts. They are completely different offenses and circumstances.

0
1

[–] spookybm 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You're in /v/Politics ... it's probably Hillary Supporters, en masse from Reddit. Sadly, their brigade could only muster two digits.

0
1

[–] deathcomesilent 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Pretty sure people are down-voting you because you're buying into the idea that the people who literally rule the world are somehow dumber than your average college kid. It's called playing dumb, and its the only social defense they have.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] flimflamedthezimzam 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Can we trade her to the Russians for Snowden? He would almost certainly come back if we pardoned him, but maybe we could still get the Russians to take Hillary.

0
1

[–] DoctorBuzzard 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Why would Putin make such a ridiculous trade... He already has every semi-coherent thought that ever popped into her entitled blonde head (At least when she was Secretary of State). Besides the Russians are still holding on to the hope that we're stupid enough to elect her president, which remains an actual probability. Remember no one EVER went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American buying public.

0
10

[–] T8nker 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

She belongs in a court not the campaign trail.

0
0

[–] ourmet 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

when you are a world leader (or an aspiring one), it's the little decisions that come back to haunt you.

I think the private email server and it's wiping is evidence of the kind of fuck-ups we would all see if she was president.

1
10

[–] helmetbox 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

The Clinton thing is the least interesting part of the interview if you ask me. Maybe I'm biased because I've been seeing this topic posted multiple times a day almost every day on this site. Original source of the interview below. From there:

“When the unclassified systems of the United States government, which has a full-time information security staff regularly gets hacked, the idea that someone keeping a private server in the renovated bathroom of a server farm in Colorado, is more secure is completely ridiculous," Snowden said, referring to the physical location of the server hosted by Denver-based Platte River Networks.

http://pr.aljazeera.com/post/128271377090/al-jazeera-englishs-upfront-exclusive-interview

0
6

[–] ChillyHellion [S] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I'm glad you brought this up because it's a good point. Different doesn't always mean better, and just because correctly stored government information is occasionally compromised doesn't make a DIY solution more secure. My problem is that even if it is, it's not legal to do so and people who have failed to comply with proper handling of classified information routinely get the book thrown at them.

2
4

[–] the_spectre 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Up next on Snowden Points Out the Obvious: The U.S. is an oligarchy.

0
0

[–] tksmase 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Oh my! But it can't be true!

0
3

[–] 2251029 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

All this info on the email controversy, and the liberal mainstream media is still trying to shove Hillary down our throats?!? They must think we're dumber than a pile of rocks!

0
0

[–] lamont_cranston 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Its too bad the first black and first female presidents are going to end up being the most worthless pieces of shit this country could produce.

0
0

[–] pacman2000 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Why would it matter they were female or black? What does race or gender have to do with someone's qualifications? Why not evaluate the person instead of just looking at them based solely on gender or race and acting like they represent that entire gender or race.

0
3

[–] unsweetenedsoymilk 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

She should be jailed. But I'm guessing that many other politicians did the same thing too, and they're probably thinking "If we start jailing one of our own, we might open the door to getting ourselves jailed too". So, the legislators who were elected by the people to protect the interests of the people are instead trying to protect themselves and their own interests... ...and the interests of their donor masters (corporations, billionaires)

1
3

[–] Woden1Eye 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

in America, your vagina equals a get out of jail free card

0
4

[–] NotJuanMadden 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Oh, please. It has nothing to do with her gender and everything to do with her last name.

1
0

[–] Woden1Eye 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I guess that's why her husband never got impeached, right?

0
1

[–] chirock 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

But she's royalty, peasant.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)