You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] cantaloupe6 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It's recoverable, they're dumb

Also legally if they destroy evidence it's assume they're guilty.

[–] itsALWAYStheBANKERS 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Sure just ask Hillary

[–] PeckerwoodPerry 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

You can assume they're Lenin if you want, the trouble is getting someone that matters to acknowledge it. This shit has being going on for a while now, and I've never seen a big player get punished in anyway. I know trump won, and I know that he's just the better of two evils. I also know that if shit was fair we wouldn't have kikes steering the metaphorical ship that is USA.

Logic, Justice, and Fairness have left the chat. Who knows if they're still alive? I'm betting on they didn't bother to do a suicide stream.

[–] cantaloupe6 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Maybe need a militia involved if local

https://trends.gab.com/item/5fc438506d63ec3465827b2f

The groups are also calling for a protest at Raffensperger’s home on Monday evening.

[–] LurkedForever 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Also legally if they destroy evidence it's assume they're guilty.

For you and me that's true, but we have a 2 tiered 'justice' system.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

[–] cantaloupe6 ago  (edited ago)

spoliation of evidence

The spoliation inference is a ...negative evidentiary inference... that a finder of fact can draw from a party's destruction of a document or thing that is relevant to an ongoing or reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal proceeding: the finder of fact can review all evidence uncovered in as strong a light as possible against the spoliator and in favor of the opposing party.

spoliation can be taken as (contributing) evidence of guilt.

Also tampering with evidence can have a heavy penalty.

If the law is actually applied remains to be seen