You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] BringtheRainOnIsrael 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

While conceding that state law and the aforementioned state Supreme Court decision means that the “directive [to securely seal the ballot secrecy envelope] is mandatory such that an elector’s noncompliance results in a ballot that is not valid,” the court decided against a “strict interpretation” of the law for the current election because of the uncertainty that accompanied Pennsylvania’s first real foray into universal mail-in voting.