This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] KhuanZi ago
This is true, but it's not what I said the reason for not letting them speak was. See, you already had an answer in mind, so much so that you didn't read mine.
Again:
What is appropriate for something like a commencement changes. Things that would have been fine 50 years ago are unacceptable now, and vice versa. That's not censorship nor is it a bad thing per se. I don't even always agree with what's acceptable, but it's the least of any issue of free speech out there.
[–] Fact_Checking_Alien ago
Again, what about this speaker is 50 years ago? What about this speaker is a Nazi? What about this speaker is unacceptable? What about this speaker is in any way comparable to, in their minds, the hyperbole you've given? In what fashion could this speaker possibly even be anything but the minor inconvenience of being disagreed with?
So tell me, and I ask you for the third time, why you don't find this a serious social dilemma?