[–] RoBatten 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

No privacy can be expected while you're out in public. What could the reasoning be? Not narrative control. Enough of those idiots are posting their crimes themselves . . .

[–] FridayJones 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Also, it's not RECORDING the rioters, it's LIVESTREAMING them. There is a qualitative difference.

[–] Rahav 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Lol. Yep it's the way you define it!


[–] Splooge 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This sort of hair-splitting is known as “pilpul.”

[–] FridayJones 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

But they ARE suspected of criminal activities such as Arson, Assault, setting roadblocks without a permit, Vandalism, and Littering. All of those are crimes on the books already.

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Soooo, they're not going to prohibit the riots, but they are going to prohibit the public viewing of the riots?

[–] NoBS 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

They can not. It is illegal.

[–] Plavonica 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Doesn't seem to stop them anymore.

[–] jamesed 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Police do not issue restraining orders only a court can do that. This was most likely done by Mike Schmidt (Democrat Multlinomah county prosecuting attorney) going before a municipal judge.

[–] 78616BC93459 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

And if the police ignore the court order, who's going to arrest them?

[–] midnightblue1335 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Well, the police of course- HEYYYY... wait a minute....

[–] Diogenes_The_Cynic ago 

Can those retard cops just stop rioting? K thanx.

[–] Mustard_Monkey ago 

I use Dlive to watch. Any other good streaming sites?

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)