You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Post them or stfu. If they are not selecting only certain sample groups or are not randomly choosing then those percentages are in no way representative of the infection rate of the entire population.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah, only the first one where they randomly tested 200 people in Chealsea is higher the numbers I said. I stand by what I said.

This one in NY says 13.9% across the state https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/04/23/coronavirus-new-york-millions-residents-may-have-been-infected-antibody-test/3012920001/

This random test in LA county is 4.2% positive https://qz.com/1841445/covid-19-may-be-undercounted-50-fold-in-la-antibody-surveys-show

This one in a rural CO county had 0.8% positive tests https://reason.com/2020/04/08/mass-antibody-testing-in-this-rural-colorado-county-sheds-light-on-covid-19s-prevalence-and-lethality/