This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] DeadlyAura 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
The article is 25 years old, but his statements are still relvant.
As long as the war on drugs is at the same (or worse) place as 1990, and as long as he still believes this, I'm all for it.
I don't do drugs (unless you consider alcohol a drug), but I agree that or current war on drugs is entirely in vain. We need a new tactic, a new direction of attack in order to make this work.
Think of it as a ground war. The soldiers fight for their superiors, their superiors carry out the orders of their leaders. In turn, the very rich, very powerful leaders give them a little wealth and power.
Now, if you (their enemy) tell the soldiers that you will stop attacking them, protect them from their leaders, and give them wealth and power while under our protection, you can effectively disassemble the army. Without the soldiers, the leaders are powerless. And now, you have an army to fight for you. You no longer spend money fighting them, but you make money off of their work. You then use this money to keep the system safe.
[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
It is, and that's the point, almost everyone is a recreational drug user to some degree, but it hasn't torn society apart.
[–] EndDrugAndOtherWars [S] ago (edited ago)
Actually, It kinda has. If I was in the business of telling people what drugs they could do (I'm not), alcohol would not be among them. It's destructive as fuck it makes people violent and stupid and dangerous
[–] EndDrugAndOtherWars [S] ago
Of course I do. Anway, I agree with your comment